2015
DOI: 10.1190/geo2013-0458.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Broadband electrical properties of clays and shales: Comparative investigations of remolded and preserved samples

Abstract: The dielectric permittivity of mudrocks cannot be determined from the mixing ratios of the constituent minerals and brine and their individual dielectric response. The high-frequency dielectric permittivity is linked (R 2 ¼ 0.77 correlation) to water content, but the relationship is complicated by mineral type and the hydration state. The cation exchange capacity (CEC) and specific surface area (SSA) determine the establishment of a polarizable electrical double layer and give rise to the long range diffusion … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ν e ¼ 3 × 10 15 s −1 is the main electronic absorption frequency (Israelachvili, 2011). The dielectric permittivity of illite ε 1 is taken from Josh and Clennell (2015). The dielectric permittivity of quartz ε 2 is independent of temperature in the range between 20 and 175°C according to Stuart (1955).…”
Section: Appendix A: Calculation Of the Particle Interaction Energy Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ν e ¼ 3 × 10 15 s −1 is the main electronic absorption frequency (Israelachvili, 2011). The dielectric permittivity of illite ε 1 is taken from Josh and Clennell (2015). The dielectric permittivity of quartz ε 2 is independent of temperature in the range between 20 and 175°C according to Stuart (1955).…”
Section: Appendix A: Calculation Of the Particle Interaction Energy Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative permittivity considered in Fig. 1c spans that expected for common minerals and rocks in dry conditions at the low end to 100 % liquid water by volume at the high end (Midi et al, 2014;Josh and Clennell, 2015). For each of the considered frequencies, the range of electrical conductivities for which neither the low-loss nor the high-loss assumption is truly justified covers about 1 order of magnitude.…”
Section: The Low-loss Assumption and Its Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…100 Wm) for er = 5, typical for dry minerals and rocks (e.g, Josh and Clennell, 2015), but is an order of magnitude higher (s = 0.1 S m -1 and r = 10 Wm) for er = 55, which would be expected either for claypoor sediments with very high water content or saturated clay-rich sediments (Arcone et al, 2008;Josh and Clennell, 2015).…”
Section: The Low-loss Assumption and Its Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…As a reminder, the angular frequency is related to the linear frequency by: w = 2pf. The relative permittivity considered in Figure 2 spans that expected for common minerals and rocks in dry conditions at the low end to 100% liquid water by volume at the high end (Midi et al, 2014;Josh and Clennell, 2015). For each of the considered frequencies, the range of electrical conductivities for which neither the low-loss, nor the high-loss, assumption is truly justified covers about one order of magnitude.…”
Section: The Low-loss Assumption and Its Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 92%