2012
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.20148788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Broadband Full Waveform Inversion by Shot/Receiver Re-focusing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first method, the sources and receivers are moved to 2, hence, reducing the size of the problem and decreasing the computation time. The redatuming needs an integral over the physical source and receivers (Wiggins, 1984); however, the finite sampling of the integrals, limited acquisition coverage, and inaccurate velocity models introduce artifacts in the virtual redatumed data (Haffinger, 2013;Mulder, 2005). The second category of methods do not modify the data acquisition setup, but they try to reconstruct an accurate local wavefield in 2 (Broggini et al, 2017;Gillman et al, 2015;Masson and Romanowicz, 2017;Robertson and Chapman, 2000;Teng, 2003;van Manen et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first method, the sources and receivers are moved to 2, hence, reducing the size of the problem and decreasing the computation time. The redatuming needs an integral over the physical source and receivers (Wiggins, 1984); however, the finite sampling of the integrals, limited acquisition coverage, and inaccurate velocity models introduce artifacts in the virtual redatumed data (Haffinger, 2013;Mulder, 2005). The second category of methods do not modify the data acquisition setup, but they try to reconstruct an accurate local wavefield in 2 (Broggini et al, 2017;Gillman et al, 2015;Masson and Romanowicz, 2017;Robertson and Chapman, 2000;Teng, 2003;van Manen et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This area of research is divided into two main categories. The first one is knows as redatuming [5,6,8,12,17,24,42,43,52,54], where we propagate the seismic survey in the region of interest. One of the biggest disadvantage of the redatuming formulation is that it modify the surface data recordings in the region of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work introduced in this paper falls into the latter category. In addition, an interesting procedure for doing local inversion in many small domains is introduced by Haffinger (2012). He poses the FWI problem in a novel way that makes possible the subdivision of the global problem into many small local problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real surveys have finite spacing between sources and between receivers, so the integrals turn into summations (Bevc 1995). The finite sampling of the integrals and the limited source and receiver coverage introduce artefacts in the redatumed data, as was demonstrated by Haffinger (2012). Mulder (2005) expressed the redatuming as an inverse problem where he tried to correct these artefacts while successfully removing most of the effects of the stripped over-burden.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%