2002
DOI: 10.21236/ada407887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Broadband Models for Predicting Bistatic Bottom, Surface, and Volume Scattering Strengths

Abstract: Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98)Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39.18Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) SPONSOR / MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S) 9. SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENC… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Direct-path measurements have revealed a strong dependence of backscattering strength at low grazing angles on wind speed and frequency (Fig. 1), and when wave breaking is significant, the backscattered levels are highly elevated over that expected solely from interface scattering [1]. This is consistent with scattering from subsurface bubbles generated by the breaking waves.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Direct-path measurements have revealed a strong dependence of backscattering strength at low grazing angles on wind speed and frequency (Fig. 1), and when wave breaking is significant, the backscattered levels are highly elevated over that expected solely from interface scattering [1]. This is consistent with scattering from subsurface bubbles generated by the breaking waves.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The CST data were particularly valuable in that the acoustic measurements were accompanied by complementary environmental measurements (such as wind speed, wave-directional spectrum, and subsurface bubble density) and, in view of the potential contribution that fish could make to the backscatter, dedicated measurements of fish scattering were also conducted. Because acoustic signatures that identify fish scattering have been developed [5,6], it has been possible to isolate their contribution from the CST data, crucial to determining the relative contributions of the air-water interface and sub-surface bubbles, especially at low-to-moderate wind speeds, and at low grazing angles and frequencies.…”
Section: Experimental Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The newly expanded technique has recently been used to develop improved algorithms for scattering from the air-sea interface [17,18], and to study the scattering behavior of the ocean bottom [2,19,20]. An overview of some of the material discussed below is published in reference [21].…”
Section: The Tradeoffs Involvedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case (interjecting a factor Since no assumptions are made about the spectral peak, the results in this section are particularly useful in problems such as scattering from the ocean bottom, where the nature of the spectral peak is site specific and rarely well-known. References [2,17,19] provide further information concerning the background and application of the expression for the stochastic cross-section derived here in Section 3.…”
Section: Cross-section Corresponding To a Power-law Spectrum With An mentioning
confidence: 99%