2001
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9892.00220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Broadband Semiparametric Estimation of the Memory Parameter of a Long‐Memory Time Series Using Fractional Exponential Models

Abstract: Abstract. We consider a fractional exponential, or FEXP estimator of the memory parameter of a stationary Gaussian long-memory time series. The estimator is constructed by ®tting a FEXP model of slowly increasing dimension to the log periodogram at all Fourier frequencies by ordinary least squares, and retaining the corresponding estimated memory parameter. We do not assume that the data were necessarily generated by a FEXP model, or by any other ®nite-parameter model. We do, however, impose a global different… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We fail to reject the unit root null at both levels when the longer maturity is at least ÿve years, reject at 5% level for the 3 month-3 year series and reject at both levels for the remaining pairs. To investigate the strength of the fractional cointegration among interest rates thoroughly, we apply both OLS and the tapered NBLS for ÿ and three estimators for d U the GSE, the GPH (Geweke and Porter-Hudak, 1983) and the FEXP (Moulines and Soulier, 1999;Hurvich and Brodsky, 2001). The GPH estimator is the least squares estimator of d in the regression model, log I ; j = C 1 − 2d log sin( j =2) + j ; j = 1; 2; : : : ; m;…”
Section: Analysis Of Interest Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We fail to reject the unit root null at both levels when the longer maturity is at least ÿve years, reject at 5% level for the 3 month-3 year series and reject at both levels for the remaining pairs. To investigate the strength of the fractional cointegration among interest rates thoroughly, we apply both OLS and the tapered NBLS for ÿ and three estimators for d U the GSE, the GPH (Geweke and Porter-Hudak, 1983) and the FEXP (Moulines and Soulier, 1999;Hurvich and Brodsky, 2001). The GPH estimator is the least squares estimator of d in the regression model, log I ; j = C 1 − 2d log sin( j =2) + j ; j = 1; 2; : : : ; m;…”
Section: Analysis Of Interest Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various devices are available for achieving this. With respect to f , Parzen (1957) employed higherorder kernels in the frequency domain, while with respect to the δ's Andrews and Sun (2004), Hurvich and Brodsky (2001), Moulines and Soulier (1999) and Robinson and Henry (2003) employed various methods (albeit justified only in case of integration orders falling in the stationarity region). All these methods entail an increase in computation, they rely on greater smoothness in f , and in practice they can sometimes exhibit disappointing small-sample properties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, consider condition (22). Recall that the conditional standard deviation of the LARCH(1) process is de…ned as t = a+ P 1 j=1 b j r t j where a 6 = 0: Giraitis, Robinson and Surgailis (2000) established the existence of the weakly stationary LARCH(1) process under the condition…”
Section: Conditional Mle In the Arch(1) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the Ejr 2 l t ( 0 )j need not be …nite and, therefore, the sum (22) does not satisfy conditions of the ergodic theorem. Because of this, it is hard to see how the condition (22) can be enforced in the LARCH (1) case. This opinion had also been conveyed to us by Prof. L. Giraitis in personal communication; he also suggested that there may exist a modi…cation of the LARCH(1) process for which these conditions are true but that they are almost certainly cannot be validated in the "classical" version of the LARCH (1) process considered here.…”
Section: Conditional Mle In the Arch(1) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation