2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00411-013-0487-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Broadbeam” irradiation of mammalian cells using a vertical microbeam facility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LET of the ion determines the dose it imparts, consequently cells are irradiated with a far greater number of low-LET ions for the same equivalent dose of high-LET particles (Jeynes et al, 2013b). Therefore the probability of an ion hitting a vesicle containing nanoparticles is greater with higher energy, low-LET protons, as there are more ions traversing the cell.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The LET of the ion determines the dose it imparts, consequently cells are irradiated with a far greater number of low-LET ions for the same equivalent dose of high-LET particles (Jeynes et al, 2013b). Therefore the probability of an ion hitting a vesicle containing nanoparticles is greater with higher energy, low-LET protons, as there are more ions traversing the cell.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells were irradiated using a 2 MV Tandetron TM High Voltage accelerator at the University of Surrey's Ion Beam Centre. The vertical beamline (Merchant et al 2012) was used, with a procedure which has been described previously (Jeynes et al 2013b). Here, the cells are pipetted onto a polypropylene-bottomed dish in a 15 µl droplet and left for 10 min for the cells to settle on the bottom of the dish.…”
Section: Proton Irradiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) were used in this study. The obtained dataset includes 267 data points from 34 publications (Aoki et al, 2000, Belli et al, 1998, Belli et al, 2008, Bird and Burki, 1975, Blomquist et al, 1993, Böhrnsen et al, 1993, Britten et al, 2013, Cox et al, 1977ab, Doria et al, 2012, Folkard et al, 1989, Folkard et al, 1996, Furusawa et al, 2000, Furusawa et al, 2002, Gerelchuluun et al, 2015, Hall et al, 1972, Hall et al, 1977, Hirayama et al, 2009, Jenner et al, 1993, Jeynes et al, 2013, Perris et al, 1986, Prise et al, 1990, Raju et al, 1991, Scholz, 2003, Schuff et al, 2002, Stenerlöw et al, 1995, Thacker et al, 1979, Tilly, 1999, Weber and Flentje, 1993, Wouters et al, 1996, Wouters et al, 2015, Wulf et al, 1985, Zhou et al, 2006 approximately 1 to 15000 keV/µm. Each data point is composed by the following quantities: the primary-beam unrestricted dose-mean LET (𝐿𝐸𝑇 ), the linear and the quadratic terms of the survival curve fitted using the linear quadratic model (McMahon, 2018) in case of ion exposure (respectively 𝛼 and 𝛽) and for the reference photon exposure (𝛼 and 𝛽 ).…”
Section: 𝐿𝐸𝑇 = ∫ 𝐿𝐸𝑇 𝑑(𝐿𝐸𝑇) D𝐿𝐸𝑇mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Wolfson Surrey vertical microbeam (WSVM) was used in this research as a facility that provides highly focused high-LET radiation. A complete description of this microbeam can be found in Merchant et al ( 30 ) and Jeynes et al ( 31 ). Therefore, only a short overview will follow.…”
Section: Clonogenic Survival Assay Using High-let Microbeam Irradiatimentioning
confidence: 99%