1981
DOI: 10.1080/10948008109488642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Broadcast Programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also helped to neutralize the network scheduling tactic of "blunting," where two popular programs were scheduled at the same time, forcing viewers to make a choice between the two (Eastman, 1994). The VCR thus increased viewers' access to existing television programs and movies, allowing it to serve as a complement to both media.…”
Section: Vcr As Both Functional Competitor and Functional (2omplementmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It also helped to neutralize the network scheduling tactic of "blunting," where two popular programs were scheduled at the same time, forcing viewers to make a choice between the two (Eastman, 1994). The VCR thus increased viewers' access to existing television programs and movies, allowing it to serve as a complement to both media.…”
Section: Vcr As Both Functional Competitor and Functional (2omplementmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These were locked in fierce competition with each other, and scheduling became an important part of broadcasters’ strategies to increase audience ratings and gain market dominance. Competitive planning became visible in a number of aggressive scheduling tactics for the era of competition for creating “flow,” such as the introduction of “slots” with fixed starting times and standardized lengths, the use of “lead-in programming” (placing a broadly popular program at the beginning of prime time), “hammocking” (placing a program with limited appeal between two popular ones) and “counterprogramming” (offering a different genre than the competition to draw audiences with a different demographic; see, for example, Blum and Lindheim 1987; Eastman et al 1985; Hargrave 1995; Howard et al 1994, Paterson 1990, Tiedge and Ksobiech 1987; Williams 1975).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%