2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-44638-3_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Broadening Label-Based Argumentation Semantics with May-Must Scales

Abstract: The semantics as to which set of arguments in a given argumentation graph may be acceptable (acceptability semantics) can be characterised in a few different ways. Among them, the labelling-based approach allows for a concise and flexible determination of acceptability statuses of arguments through assignment of a label indicating acceptance, rejection, or undecided to each argument. In this work, we contemplate a way of broadening it by accommodating mayand must-conditions for an argument to be accepted and r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to necessary and evidential support interpretations [13][14][15], our theory can deal with the desired causality relation generally, and can also cope with causality loops in computing acceptability semantics. Compared to (numerical) abstract persuasion argumentation [2,3], it handles causal dependency more concisely without needing a state transition system. Further, the causal-semantics have not been formulated in the dynamic argumentation theory, or in structured argumentation [11,12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to necessary and evidential support interpretations [13][14][15], our theory can deal with the desired causality relation generally, and can also cope with causality loops in computing acceptability semantics. Compared to (numerical) abstract persuasion argumentation [2,3], it handles causal dependency more concisely without needing a state transition system. Further, the causal-semantics have not been formulated in the dynamic argumentation theory, or in structured argumentation [11,12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the causal-semantics have not been formulated in the dynamic argumentation theory, or in structured argumentation [11,12]. For future work, it can be interesting to also consider the labelling-based semantics [2,6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation