Broader outcomes in procurement policy – a case of New Zealand pragmatism

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate how the underpinning ideas of public procurement allowed for broader outcomes – a more strategic form of public procurement – to emerge. The paper contributes to the literature on public procurement by empirically addressing the evolution of procurement as a government policy lever in New Zealand so as to demonstrate how policy pragmatism can ensure a shift without a complete overhaul of a complex system. Design/methodology/approach The paper has used a single country case study to examine a recent development in procurement policy. The objectives of the paper are achieved by adopting a unique conceptual framework connecting ideas, sensemaking and bricolage. Findings The paper provides empirical and conceptual insights about how bricolage, or policy pragmatism, aids in dealing with the constraints of ideational legacies. It demonstrates a particular form of targeting in procurement, common in public administration but not well understood in the procurement field. Research limitations/implications Single country case studies lack scientific generalizability. However, they add to the canon of knowledge that is lacking in the field of public procurement in this case. They also provide a stronger starting point for further research especially with respect to comparative studies. Practical implications The paper provides an excellent example of the development of procurement policy that is useful for procurement officials from other countries undergoing change or looking to update or create procurement policies. It shows a high-level process of implementation for government priority outcomes from a country well-known for its quality of public management and governance. Social implications New Zealand has significant equity issues especially as related to its indigenous population. Procurement is being used increasingly as a lever to improve equity. This article includes information about New Zealand's uptake of social procurement. Originality/value This paper fulfils a need for greater understanding of how policy is “put together” and the dynamics at major points of change or the implications of policy changes. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this case study of procurement policy in New Zealand is original, and the author is aware of no other similar work emanating from New Zealand in the academic journals.

Equity in government contracting: Analyzing the performance of small disadvantaged businesses

“…Instead, the US federal government has been able to invest billions of dollars in small firms and encountered no substantive performance differences (and may even see performance benefits in some industries). Other studies have shown that public procurement programs are improving social and economic outcomes in communities of color and for women (Allen, 2021; McIver et al, 2018; Ryu & Sueyoshi, 2021). Yet worries persist that procurement equity programs incur hidden performance risks for governments.…”

Media reporting on public procurement: an analysis of UK press coverage, 1985–2018

“…Scholarly and policy focus on public procurement is the result of several interlinked factors. First, there is appreciation of the strategic role that procurement plays in public administration and public service delivery: strategic in the sense that procurement can help public sector organisations achieve their corporate objectives related to cost containment, service delivery and socio-economic objectives (Allen, 2021; Glas et al , 2017). Second, procurement spend is recognised as important in giving effect to what Arrowsmith (2010) called “horizontal policies”.…”

“…Academic understanding of public procurement has evolved over the last twenty years. From its earlier status as an administrative function, there is now recognition of the strategic role that public procurement can play in achieving value for money (VfM), delivering improved services for end-users and supporting government sustainability objectives (Allen, 2021; Glas et al , 2017). It remains to be seen whether the media has represented public procurement in these same ways or if it has taken a different approach.…”

Twenty-one years of the Journal of Public Procurement: a performance and content review using bibliometric analysis

“…Public sector procurement is identified globally as a key source of value creation for governments and their agencies through the function's cost-saving potential. The strategic importance of procurement to public administration through its support to public sector institutions toward achieving their mandates relative to cost containment, service delivery and other socio-economic objectives has been widely recognized in the literature (Allen, 2021;Flynn and Harris, 2022;Glas et al, 2017). Despite its rich history as well as its strategic importance, the recognition of procurement within the academic circles is a very recent development.…”