2017
DOI: 10.17659/01.2017.0032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Broken Epidural Catheter: An Anesthesiologist’s Dilemma

Abstract: Epidural anesthesia is a safe procedure and is routinely performed by the anesthesiologists. Breakage of an epidural catheter is a rare, but a worrisome complication. However, if this happens, the presence of retained epidural catheter fragment should be properly documented and should also be informed to the surgical team and the patient. Here, we present two cases of such an event and also highlighting the common reasons that could have precipitated that event.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was first reported in the literature in 1957 and there is no consensus on management; the major decision lies between leaving an asymptomatic retained fragment in situ or surgical exploration with removal. 1 , 2 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was first reported in the literature in 1957 and there is no consensus on management; the major decision lies between leaving an asymptomatic retained fragment in situ or surgical exploration with removal. 1 , 2 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sardana, Mitra, and colleagues 1 , 2 advise that the fragment may be left alone in most cases, arguing that any sequestered catheter fragment is inert so should produce no foreign body reaction, whereas surgical removal could do more harm than good. Reena and Vikram 3 suggest that surgery should be reserved only for symptomatic cases without clear definition of what constitutes a symptom(s) in this situation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Sardana et al, [ 7 ] and Mitra and Fleischmann [ 8 ] the fragment may be left alone in most cases, arguing that any sequestered catheter fragment is inert and should produce no foreign body reaction, whereas surgical removal could do more harm than good. If a catheter fragment is retained within the spinal canal, Tarukado et al, [ 9 ] propose that surgery should be considered before adhesions advance, while Ugboma et al [ 10 ] recommend aggressive surgical exploration and extraction, even in asymptomatic patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found 5 (13.8%) cases whereby a fragment was sheared off as a result of being cut by the Touhy needle as it was withdrawn through it [24][25][26][27][28] and 4 (11.1%) cases of fragments fracturing from excessive force during extraction together with the Touhy needle. 16,29,30 There were 2 cases where the retained catheters were incidental findings many years after insertion 31,34 and 1 case of migration to the paravertebral space. 33…”
Section: Potential Mechanisms and Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%