2000
DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200006000-00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Broken Instrument Removal—Two Cases

Abstract: This paper reports two clinical aids for the removal of broken instruments in root canals using a combination of hand instrumentation and ultrasonic devices. This technique is based on two phases: hand instrumentation with stainless-steel K-file instruments for bypassing the fragments, and K-files mounted on an ultrasonic handpiece for loosening and retrieval of the broken instruments. This method offers the following advantages: conservation of the remaining dentin wall of the root canal and elimination of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…D'Arcangelo et al (9) described a technique for removal of broken instruments. It consisted of hand instrumentation with stainless steel K-files alongside the broken instrument until bypassed or at least passing its coronal half.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D'Arcangelo et al (9) described a technique for removal of broken instruments. It consisted of hand instrumentation with stainless steel K-files alongside the broken instrument until bypassed or at least passing its coronal half.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] A separated instrument prevents thorough root canal cleaning and shaping apical to the level of separation and hinders the clinician from optimally preparing and obturating the entire root canal system. [23]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Success rate for instrument retrieval can be quite variable and a success rate ranging from 55% to 87% has been reported in the endodontic literature. [235]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its incidence ranges from 2% to 6% of the cases investigated. [1] The clinical outcome of the cases with fractured instruments depends on several factors such as: the position of the instrument in the canal, type of material, instrument size and canal anatomy. Failure in retrieval of the fractured instrument does not automatically result in failure of the case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%