Flexible Bronchoscopy 2020
DOI: 10.1002/9781119389231.ch14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bronchoalveolar Lavage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 185 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25 Similarly, a study by Zhang, et al (2020) compared the diagnostic accuracy of virtual bronchoscopic navigation (VBN) and radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (RP-EBUS) for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions and found that VBN had a higher diagnostic yield (92.1%) than RP-EBUS (81.6%). 18 These findings suggest that new bronchoscopic technologies may improve the diagnostic accuracy and yield for lung cancer detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…25 Similarly, a study by Zhang, et al (2020) compared the diagnostic accuracy of virtual bronchoscopic navigation (VBN) and radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (RP-EBUS) for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions and found that VBN had a higher diagnostic yield (92.1%) than RP-EBUS (81.6%). 18 These findings suggest that new bronchoscopic technologies may improve the diagnostic accuracy and yield for lung cancer detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The diagnostic yield is significantly higher in diffuse disease processes that spread through lymphatic or lepidic growth, such as bronchoalveolar cell carcinoma (BAC) and adenocarcinoma. 6,18 Rao, et al as cited by Błach, et al (2021), evaluated the efficiency of bronchial wash cytology in diagnosing bronchopulmonary lesions and classifying dysplastic/malignant lesions. The technique of bronchial wash cytology showed high specificity and cytohistopathology correlation, revealing a concordance rate of 62.06%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distinction between BAL and bronchial wash lies in the volume of normal saline used, ranging from 100-300 mL by streaming 20-50 mL several times in multiple bronchial branches, which later collected in a mucus extractor and its aliquot is subtracted to be analyzed. 11,12 Both procedures are diagnostic methods for identifying the coinfection of microorganisms in COVID-19 pneumonia to establish definitive antibiotic therapy and improve the patient's prognosis. 4 13 Diagnosis of COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis is obtained through culture and measurement of galactomannan level of BAL with a positivity rate of 55-61%.…”
Section: Indication and Objective Of Ffb In Patients With Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three techniques have been described for aspirating the BAL fluid, namely wall mount suction (WMS), manual suction (MS), and manual suction with tubing (MST) 8–11 . Wall suction is performed by applying negative pressure using continuous wall suction 2,8 . MS is performed by gently applying the negative pressure by pulling the plunger of a 50 mL syringe 8,11 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BAL has a high diagnostic value and is a crucial research tool for various lung diseases, including infections, malignancy, diffuse parenchymal lung diseases (DPLDs), and others. 1,2 The typical BAL fluid cellular components comprise alveolar macrophages 85%, lymphocytes 5% to 15%, neutrophils ≤ 3%, and eosinophils < 1%. 3,4 The presence of squamous epithelial cells indicates contamination by oropharyngeal secretions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%