2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-020-03932-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brownian Loops, Layering Fields and Imaginary Gaussian Multiplicative Chaos

Abstract: We study fields reminiscent of vertex operators built from the Brownian loop soup in the limit as the loop soup intensity tends to infinity. More precisely, following Camia et al. (Nucl Phys B 902:483–507, 2016), we take a (massless or massive) Brownian loop soup in a planar domain and assign a random sign to each loop. We then consider random fields defined by taking, at every point of the domain, the exponential of a purely imaginary constant times the sum of the signs associated to the loops that wind aroun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Either of these can be given a physical interpretation similar to the one described above: if the Brownian loops themselves (for the winding operator) or their outer boundaries (for the layering operator) represent a domain wall or charged object across which some quantity (like the value of a scalar field, or the electric field) changes discontinuously, then these operators are counting the value of that field at the point z (this is also known as a height model). The layering and winding vertex operators in the infinite intensity limit have been studied in [12,13].…”
Section: Background and Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Either of these can be given a physical interpretation similar to the one described above: if the Brownian loops themselves (for the winding operator) or their outer boundaries (for the layering operator) represent a domain wall or charged object across which some quantity (like the value of a scalar field, or the electric field) changes discontinuously, then these operators are counting the value of that field at the point z (this is also known as a height model). The layering and winding vertex operators in the infinite intensity limit have been studied in [12,13].…”
Section: Background and Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the variance of the probability distribution exists, there exists a limit in which the correlators in the full plane become those of free field vertex operators. Consider now taking β i → 0 and λ → ∞ with the product λβ 2 i fixed (this limit is discussed in detail in [12]). The Taylor expansion of the characteristic function is…”
Section: Free Field Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposition 2.2 of [18] implies that, for any f ∈ C ∞ 0 (D), the number of elements in the sum defining Φ a D,ε (f ) remains finite as a ↓ 0; hence for every f ∈ C ∞ 0 (D), by Theorem 4.3, Φ a D,ε (f ) converges in distribution to Φ 0 D,ε (f ) as a ↓ 0. This, combined with the tightness of Φ a D,ε and with Lemma A.4 of [10], shows that, as k → ∞, Φ a k D,ε converges to Φ 0 D,ε in distribution in the topology induced by • H −α (D) . Therefore, i:diam(C i )≤ε η i µ a k i also converges in distribution in the topology induced by • H −α (D) to some Xε ∈ H −α (D), and Φ a k D converges to Φ0 D = Φ 0 D,ε + Xε .…”
Section: The Critical Scaling Limitmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…To see why (4.6) holds, following [10], one can assume without loss of generality that α ≥ 1 is an integer. For such an α and for every f ∈ C ∞ 0 (D), one has that (−∆) α f ∈ C ∞ 0 (D), and consequently (−∆) α f = i (−∆) α f, u i L 2 (D) u i , where the series converges in L 2 (D).…”
Section: The Critical Scaling Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proofs of Theorem 1.7 and Corollary 1.8, presented in Section 3, use ideas and tools from [11,[14][15][16], as well as properties of the conformal measure ensemble for critical percolation whose existence was conjectured in [21] and proved in [12].…”
Section: More Generally If We Introduce the Normalized Counting Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%