2009
DOI: 10.20506/rst.28.3.1947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brucella suis infection in domestic pigs and wild boar in Croatia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
47
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both biovars 1 and 3 have been reported in the United States, Australia, and China. 35 Biovar 2 is the most common strain in Europe. 50,118 Biovars 1, 2, and 4 can be transmitted from swine to cattle, inducing transient seroconversion, which can confound B. abortus diagnostic assays.…”
Section: Brucella Suismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both biovars 1 and 3 have been reported in the United States, Australia, and China. 35 Biovar 2 is the most common strain in Europe. 50,118 Biovars 1, 2, and 4 can be transmitted from swine to cattle, inducing transient seroconversion, which can confound B. abortus diagnostic assays.…”
Section: Brucella Suismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is considered as one of the great public health problem all over the world [1]. There are five biovars of B. suis with biovars 1, 2 and 3 of Brucella suis infect primarily domestic and feral pigs, as well as wild boar (Sus scrofa) [2][3][4]. Brucellosis in pigs is a chronic disease most often characterized by infertility and abortion in sows and by orchitis in boars [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occurrence of anti-Brucella antibodies in intensive pig farming and in non-technified pig herds Thereby Gresham et al (2002) showed that the prevalence of brucellosis in feral pig population in the South Carolina state increased gradually from 18% to over 40% in a decade, being this population source of several infectious diseases for domestic pigs. Between 2000 and 2004, a seroepidemiological survey on 93,107 samples from 1,997 herds in Croatia found an individual prevalence of 1% and a herd prevalence of 3.4%., With the exception of two herds, almost all of the infected animals were from non-technified pig herds, which enables contact with wild animals (Cvetnić et al 2009). In Brazil, Freitas et al (2004) analyzed wild animals sera in South Pantanal and obtained seropositivity for Brucella spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%