2021
DOI: 10.1007/s13205-021-02841-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brucine-loaded transliposomes nanogel for topical delivery in skin cancer: statistical optimization, in vitro and dermatokinetic evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Upon shifting the level of X2 from low to high value, %RE increases from 44.62±1.36% to 66.39±1.24% which indicates a positive correlation between X2 and X3 (verified by the+sign of the coefficient of estimates). As stated previously, VS of TEs decreases with increased SAA concentration and hence increases surface area resulting in higher %RE [34]. A similar pattern also occurs in the case of X3 where the vesicles prepared via labrafil attain %RE of 44.62±1.36% when compared to cremophore 56.72±2.38% and this is in harmony with the outcomes as per Albash et al [1] where SAA with low HLB value slows down the drug release.…”
Section: Influence Of Formulation Variables On Release Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Upon shifting the level of X2 from low to high value, %RE increases from 44.62±1.36% to 66.39±1.24% which indicates a positive correlation between X2 and X3 (verified by the+sign of the coefficient of estimates). As stated previously, VS of TEs decreases with increased SAA concentration and hence increases surface area resulting in higher %RE [34]. A similar pattern also occurs in the case of X3 where the vesicles prepared via labrafil attain %RE of 44.62±1.36% when compared to cremophore 56.72±2.38% and this is in harmony with the outcomes as per Albash et al [1] where SAA with low HLB value slows down the drug release.…”
Section: Influence Of Formulation Variables On Release Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 83%
“…For given levels of each variable, the coded equation yields an estimate of the response (Y2) where the coefficient of estimates for X1 has a positive sign indicating a positive correlation between lipoid S100 concentration and TE vesicle size which means that increasing the level of X1 from 1% (89.97±2.11 nm) to 4% (133.2±1.62 nm) resulted in larger vesicle size. Phospholipid concentration (Lipoid S100) has been demonstrated to alter the vesicular size, with increasing phospholipid concentration increasing the vesicular size by continuing to increase bilayer width [33,34]. On the contrary, X2 and X3 presented a negative correlation with VS based on the sign of the coefficient of estimates (-15.48 and-14.81).…”
Section: Influence Of Formulation Variables On Vesicle Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developing liposomes for topical drug delivery system could face certain difficulties related to their low viscosities and improper application to the skin [ 13 ]. Integrating liposomes into emulgel formulation could possibly increase the viscosity of the formulation and facilitate its application over the affected area [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skin cancer activates the excessive growth of cells in the outermost layer, i.e., the epidermis, initiated by unrepaired DNA impairment in cells, resulting in mutations. Such modified epidermal cells propagate rapidly and generate malignant tumors [ 2 ]. In this way, abnormal dermis layers synchronize with the physiological alterations and prompt abnormal environments, leading to different types of cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%