2014
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu1917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bruck 88: a young star cluster with an old age resemblance in the outskirts of the Small Magellanic Cloud

Abstract: We present spectroscopic and photometric results for the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) cluster Bruck 88. From the comparison of the cluster integrated spectrum with template cluster spectra we found that the Milky Way globular cluster template spectra are the ones which best resemble it. However, the extracted cluster colour magnitude diagram reveals that Bruck 88 is a young cluster (log(t) = 8.1 ± 0.1). The derived cluster age is compatible with the presence of a Bright Red Giant (BRG) star located ∼ 2.6 arcse… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A striking feature of this young cluster sample is their uniformity in age. As determined from isochrone comparisons to observed CMDs (Alcaino et al 2003;Glatt, Grebel & Koch 2010;Piatti 2014), the cluster ages pile up around ∼ 160 Myr [log(age/yr)=8.2±0.1] and appear consistent with this single age, within current fitting uncertainties. We demonstrate the agreement with a single age by over-plotting an isochrone with log(age/yr)=8.2 on top of a summed SMASH CMD created for the nine cluster sample (see lower panel in Fig.…”
Section: Young Star Clustersmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…A striking feature of this young cluster sample is their uniformity in age. As determined from isochrone comparisons to observed CMDs (Alcaino et al 2003;Glatt, Grebel & Koch 2010;Piatti 2014), the cluster ages pile up around ∼ 160 Myr [log(age/yr)=8.2±0.1] and appear consistent with this single age, within current fitting uncertainties. We demonstrate the agreement with a single age by over-plotting an isochrone with log(age/yr)=8.2 on top of a summed SMASH CMD created for the nine cluster sample (see lower panel in Fig.…”
Section: Young Star Clustersmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The added noise by contaminating field stars is also a key issue, as this noise is very difficult to remove properly from integrated photometry data. A single overly bright field star can substantially modify the observed luminosity of the cluster, leading to incorrect estimates of its parameters (Baumgardt et al 2013;Piatti 2014). A detailed analysis of some of the issues encountered by integrated photometry studies and of the accuracy of their results is presented in Anders et al (2013).…”
Section: Databases Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, there is a small number of clusters with measured distances (see Section 2), which points to the need of observational campaigns in order to build a realistic spatial distribution of them (Piatti 2021b), and consequently, to trace more precisely the 3D SMC cluster population structure. Previous star cluster studies adopted, in general, a mean SMC distance when dealing with cluster colour-magnitudes diagrams (Piatti 2012(Piatti , 2014Piatti et al 2016, and references therein). This is because changes in the distance modulus by an amount equivalent to the average depth of the SMC (Crowl et al 2001;Ripepi et al 2017;Graczyk et al 2020), so that clusters can be placed in front or behind the SMC, leads to a smaller age difference than that resulting from the isochrones bracketing the observed star cluster features in the colour-magnitude diagram.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%