Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition--Brief Form

Bruininks, Robert H.; Bruininks, Brett D.

doi:10.1037/t14992-000

Cited by 16 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The impact on the gross and fine motor function was assessed using the BOT-2 Brief Form. 18 This tool contains 12 subtests that measure four motor domains, that is fine manual control (fine motor precision, two subtests; and fine motor integration, two subtests), manual coordination (manual dexterity, one subtest; and upper-limb coordination, two subtests), body coordination (bilateral coordination, two subtests; and balance, one subtest) and strength and agility (speed and agility, one subtest; and strength, one subtest). In this tool, five descriptive categories were derived from the standard scores for age-sex specified norms based on the manual to describe levels of motor proficiency (ranging from well below average to well above average).…”

Section: Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Vincristine‐induced peripheral neuropathy in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Tay

Lee

Ong

et al. 2017

Pediatric Blood & Cancer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Vincristine‐induced peripheral neuropathy in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Tay

Lee

Ong

et al. 2017

Pediatric Blood & Cancer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Test stations were established to allow multiple participant assessments, simultaneously. The child, guided by the examiner, determined whether a full or knee pushup was the most appropriate assessment of strength based on the pupil's performance in other areas, as per the BOT-2 BF manual (Bruininks & Oseretsky, 2010). A research team was collectively trained to administer the test, primarily through jointly observing participant performance of each element of the test.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…All the test items and sub-tests originated from the full assessment and were selected for "clinical utility, content coverage, and ease of administration" (Bruininks & Oseretsky, 2010). Test stations were established to allow multiple participant assessments, simultaneously.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The BOT-2 BF was selected for its suitability to assess children with and without motor problems and strong test-retest reliability (Yoon et al, 2006), as well as being a validated assessment instrument for motor proficiency for participants aged between 4-21 years of age (Bruininks & Oseretsky, 2010). The BOT-2 BF consisted of 12 measures of motor proficiency, which are categorized into sub-tests to assess fine motor precision, fine motor integration, manual dexterity, bilateral co-ordination, balance, speed and agility, upper-limb co-ordination and strength.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The standard score for each pupil was reached by converting the total points score (max = 72) to the standard score, using the gender-specific norms provided (Bruininks & Oseretsky, 2010). This took the child's age, gender and choice of strength assessment (push-up: full/ knee) into account when assessing their performance.…”

Section: Bot-2 Bf Scoringmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Influences of gender and socioeconomic status on the motor proficiency of children in the UK

Morley

Till

Ogilvie

et al. 2015

Human Movement Science

132

119

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As the development of movement skills are so crucial to a child's involvement in lifelong physical activity and sport, the purpose of this study was to assess the motor proficiency of children aged 4-7 years (range= 4.3-7.2 years), while considering gender and socioeconomic status. 369 children (176 females, 193 males, aged = 5.96±0.57 years) were assessed for Fine Motor Precision, Fine Motor Integration, Manual Dexterity, Bilateral Co-ordination, Balance, Speed and Agility, Upper-Limb Co-ordination and Strength. The average standard score for all participants was 44.4 ± 8.9, classifying the participants towards the lower end of the average score. Multivariate analysis of covariance identified significant effects for gender (p<0.001) and socioeconomic status (p<0.001). Females outperformed males for fine motor skills and boys outperformed girls for catch and dribble gross motor skills. High socioeconomic status significantly outperformed middle and / or low socioeconomic status for total, fine and gross motor proficiency. Current motor proficiency of primary children aged 4-7 years in the UK is just below average with differences evident between gender and socioeconomic status. Teachers and sport coaches working with primary aged children should concentrate on the development of movement skills, while considering differences between genders and socioeconomic status.

show abstract

When an object appears unexpectedly: foot placement during obstacle circumvention in children and adults with Developmental Coordination Disorder

Wilmut

Barnett

2017

Exp Brain Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Adjustments to locomotion to avoid an obstacle require a change to the usual pattern of foot placement, i.e. changes to step length and/or step width. Previous studies have demonstrated a difficulty in individuals with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) in controlling stability while both stepping over and while circumventing an obstacle. In a previous study, we have considered the way in which individuals with DCD prepare for the possibility of an obstacle appearing (Wilmut and Barnett in Exp Brain Res 235:1531-1340, 2017). Using a parallel data set from this same task on the same individuals, the aim of the current study was to investigate the exact nature of changes in foot placement during obstacle avoidance, as this was not clear from previous work. Children and adults aged from 7 to 34 years of age took part in the study. Forty-four met the criteria for a diagnosis of DCD and there were 44 typically developing (TD) age and gender-matched controls. Participants walked at a comfortable pace down an 11 m walkway; on 6 out of 36 trials a 'gate' closed across their pathway which required circumvention. These 6 'gate close' trials were analysed for this study. The number and magnitude of step length and step width adjustments were similar across the DCD and TD groups, however, the younger children (7-11 years) made a greater number of early adjustments compared to the older children and adults (12-34 years of age). In contrast the adults made a greater number of adjustments later in the movement compared to the children. In terms of foot placement adjustments a clear preference was seen across all participants to use adjustments which resulted in reducing step length, stepping away from the obstacle and a combination of these. Apart from subtle differences, the individuals with DCD make step placements to circumvent an obstacle in line with their peers. It is suggested that the choice of foot placement strategy in individuals with DCD, although in line with their peers, may not be optimal for their level of motor ability.

show abstract

Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition--Brief Form

Cited by 16 publications

References 0 publications

Vincristine‐induced peripheral neuropathy in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Vincristine‐induced peripheral neuropathy in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Influences of gender and socioeconomic status on the motor proficiency of children in the UK

When an object appears unexpectedly: foot placement during obstacle circumvention in children and adults with Developmental Coordination Disorder

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About