Lost Plays in Shakespeare’s England 2014
DOI: 10.1057/9781137403971_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brute Parts: From Troy to Britain at the Rose, 1595–1600

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Needless to say, the proposal brought forward in these pages -like most arguments about lost plays -must necessarily rely to a large extent on conjectures, however sensible and informed they may be: Misha Teramura voices a common concern when he wonders, 'can there be criticism without a text?'. 50 As Steggle remarks, 'one must always remember that the evidence base is … much smaller and more vulnerable than for a play whose playscript is extant'. 51 As a result, 'Telomo' might simply have been a different character entirely, now utterly unknown to us, completely lost in the mists of time.…”
Section: Informed Conjecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Needless to say, the proposal brought forward in these pages -like most arguments about lost plays -must necessarily rely to a large extent on conjectures, however sensible and informed they may be: Misha Teramura voices a common concern when he wonders, 'can there be criticism without a text?'. 50 As Steggle remarks, 'one must always remember that the evidence base is … much smaller and more vulnerable than for a play whose playscript is extant'. 51 As a result, 'Telomo' might simply have been a different character entirely, now utterly unknown to us, completely lost in the mists of time.…”
Section: Informed Conjecturementioning
confidence: 99%