“…However, since the agreement analysis among representations is typically assessed using cosine similarity of the related embeddings, these contrasting approaches cannot systematically account for similarity of higher-order graph properties, for instance, simultaneous matching among subgraphs of varying sizes and orders. In turn, such polyadic node interactions, including various network motifs and other multi-node graph substructures, often play the key role in graph learning tasks, especially, in conjunction with prediction of protein functions in protein-protein interactions and fraud detection in financial networks (Benson, Gleich, and Leskovec 2016;Chen, Gel, and Poor 2022). Interestingly, as shown by (You et al 2020), subgraphs also tend to play the uniformly consistent role in the data augmentation step of GCL across all types of the considered graphs, from bioinformatics to social networks.…”