2005
DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2005.1504019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bubble-based acoustic radiation force elasticity imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An ultrafast Nd:glass laser (IntraLase Corp., Irvine, CA), described previously (Erpelding et al, 2005a), used 800 fs, 1053 nm pulses to create target microbubbles by LIOB. A mechanical shutter controlled the number of laser pulses delivered (3,000-25,000), while a neutral density filter controlled the laser pulse energy.…”
Section: Laser-induced Optical Breakdown (Liob)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…An ultrafast Nd:glass laser (IntraLase Corp., Irvine, CA), described previously (Erpelding et al, 2005a), used 800 fs, 1053 nm pulses to create target microbubbles by LIOB. A mechanical shutter controlled the number of laser pulses delivered (3,000-25,000), while a neutral density filter controlled the laser pulse energy.…”
Section: Laser-induced Optical Breakdown (Liob)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonlinear radial oscillations of the bubble were avoided by using an insonation frequency much greater than the bubble resonance frequency. Bubble size was monitored during radiation force measurements using the magnitude of acoustic backscatter (Erpelding et al, 2005a(Erpelding et al, , 2006, as described below.…”
Section: Laser-induced Optical Breakdown (Liob)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This may be due to the difficulty of constructing a physically realistic phantom and the low interaction between the image processing and phantom design communities. Almost all of the reported cardiac-like ultrasound phantoms, are designed for tissue characterization or strain measurements [11][12][13] rather than for assessing segmentation of the boundary of the myocardium.…”
Section: Evaluating and Explaining Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%