2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2005.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bubble detector characterization for space radiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The expected peaks at around 1 MeV and above 10 MeV are observed in the data from all four USOS locations. These characteristic features have been observed in earlier work using bubble detectors (3 -5, 7, 8) and other instruments (11,15) deployed in aircraft and spacecraft. The limited counting statistics of a single week-long measurement (discussed earlier in this article) are apparent in the data shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The expected peaks at around 1 MeV and above 10 MeV are observed in the data from all four USOS locations. These characteristic features have been observed in earlier work using bubble detectors (3 -5, 7, 8) and other instruments (11,15) deployed in aircraft and spacecraft. The limited counting statistics of a single week-long measurement (discussed earlier in this article) are apparent in the data shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…This scaling factor accounts for the difference between the AmBe energy spectrum and the spectrum expected in space. It was determined using theoretical calculations of the bubble-detector response and measurements that validated these calculations (5,11,12) . Following this procedure, the dosimetric quantity reported by bubble detectors in the space environment is the ambient dose equivalent, H* (10).…”
Section: Bubble Detector Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, nucleation is expected to be induced by heavy recoil nuclei generated by nonelastic interactions of protons with the phantom matrix or the nanodroplets themselves, as well as by similarly released alpha particles, whose LET lie in the range 130–190 keV/µm, 62 for the 37°C case. At 50°C, the predicted threshold drops further down to 60 keV/µm, allowing sensitization to primary protons that reach an LET up to 70–90 keV/µm at the very end of their range, 63 while being too high to observe vaporization induced by secondary electrons (LET of 25–30 keV/µm 31 ). This sensitization to the primary proton beam is clearly demonstrated by the strong contrast increase at the end of the vaporization curves and could even be observed visually (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the degree of superheat of PFB is below the sensitization threshold for protons at the physiological temperature of 37°C [12]. Previously, the degree of superheat of bubble chambers and superheated drop detectors was tuned by modifying the ambient temperature [30], [31], the static ambient pressure [32], or by using superheated liquids with different boiling temperatures [33], [34]. While the first two options are unfeasible in an in vivo application, the last option also suffers from several limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%