2013
DOI: 10.1145/2508148.2485974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bubble-flux

Abstract: Ensuring the quality of service (QoS) for latency-sensitive applications while allowing co-locations of multiple applications on servers is critical for improving server utilization and reducing cost in modern warehouse-scale computers (WSCs). Recent work relies on static profiling to precisely predict the QoS degradation that results from performance interference among co-running applications to increase the number of "safe" co-locations. However, these static profiling techniques have… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is configured to model diurnal load changes (Figure 1), simulating a period of 36 hours [22]; each hour in the original workload corresponds to one minute in our experiments. For the batch workloads [51,52], we use the programs from the SPEC CPU 2006 suite [53].…”
Section: Experimental Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is configured to model diurnal load changes (Figure 1), simulating a period of 36 hours [22]; each hour in the original workload corresponds to one minute in our experiments. For the batch workloads [51,52], we use the programs from the SPEC CPU 2006 suite [53].…”
Section: Experimental Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques require extensive microarchitectural feature tuning prior to deployment in production clusters. Secondly, prior work [9,14,16,21,69,70] detect interference among colocated services and adjust resource allocation dynamically or disallow colocation of LC services. While this approach works well to maintain QoS, it is imperative to both increase system throughput and improve energy efficiency to increase revenue.…”
Section: B Twig Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Managing shared-resource contention is a well-studied but still an open problem [5,[8][9][10][11]. Prior work has addressed this problem in two ways, by (a) disallowing resource sharing for LC services in periods of high load to avoid interference [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] or (b) disallowing colocation of services even if they are unlikely to interfere with each other [20][21][22]. Blindly applying either solution preserves the QoS of the LC service but results in low server-efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is con gured to model diurnal load changes (Figure 1), simulating a period of 36 hours [47]; each hour in the original workload corresponds to one minute in our experiments. For the batch workloads [44,71], we use the programs from the SPEC CPU 2006 suite [30].…”
Section: :12 • R Nishtala Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%