2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.01.181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bubble formation from an orifice in liquid cross-flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted here that as the ethanol concentration is increased from 0 wt% to 10 wt%, the surface tension is reduced by 34%, whereas the liquid viscosity is increased by 68%. However, several studies revealed that the influence of liquid viscosity on bubble formation is negligible, especially at low gas flow rates (Kumar and Kuloor 1970;Gerlach et al 2007;Mirsandi et al 2019). The apparent contact angle between the liquid phases and the orifice material for each solution is measured using a DataPhysics OCA-30 contact angle goniometer equipped with a TBU 90E tilting base unit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be noted here that as the ethanol concentration is increased from 0 wt% to 10 wt%, the surface tension is reduced by 34%, whereas the liquid viscosity is increased by 68%. However, several studies revealed that the influence of liquid viscosity on bubble formation is negligible, especially at low gas flow rates (Kumar and Kuloor 1970;Gerlach et al 2007;Mirsandi et al 2019). The apparent contact angle between the liquid phases and the orifice material for each solution is measured using a DataPhysics OCA-30 contact angle goniometer equipped with a TBU 90E tilting base unit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2011). All these methods have been used to simulate bubble formation from an orifice (Gerlach et al 2007;Buwa et al 2007;Quan and Hua 2008;Chakraborty et al 2009;Yujie et al 2012;Albadawi et al 2013;Xu et al 2015;Mirsandi et al 2018Mirsandi et al , 2019Kong et al 2019). However, only a few numerical studies have taken into account the influence of the moving contact line (Kandlikar and Steinke 2002;Gerlach et al 2007;Buwa et al 2007;Chen et al 2013) and the majority of them assumed a constant contact angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical model used in the present work is based on the Local Front Reconstruction Method (LFRM), originally developed by Shin et al (2011) and adjusted by Mirsandi et al (2018Mirsandi et al ( , 2019. In the sections below, the main characteristics of the numerical model are described.…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variation of the liquid-fraction with different numbers of cells are presented in Figure 3 a. As shown, the results for all grid resolutions are identical with the maximum difference of less than 1.5% [ 66 ]. Therefore, the mesh with the cell number of 172,016 is sufficient for the modelling.…”
Section: Numerical Modelling and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%