1991
DOI: 10.1002/aic.690370202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bubble size prediction for rigid and flexible spargers

Abstract: There exists a narrow operating window in bubble columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
0
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The average diameter of bubbles entering the system was determined to be 8 mm. This value is in good agreement with correlation for inlet bubble size given by Geary and Rice (1991).…”
Section: Bubble Size Distributionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The average diameter of bubbles entering the system was determined to be 8 mm. This value is in good agreement with correlation for inlet bubble size given by Geary and Rice (1991).…”
Section: Bubble Size Distributionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…They introduced this as an important element in membrane sparger design. Geary and Rice (1991) predicted the bubble size from rigid and ''flexible spargers,'' but several variables have to be measured to use their theory.…”
Section: Membrane Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30b). It is worth noting that the BSD at the sparger depends on many design parameters (i.e., the hole of the sparger and the flowrate) as reported by Hur et al (2013) and Geary and Rice (1991). For example, a sensitivity analysis made by Cao et al (2009) using the Geary and Rice (1991) model showed that increasing hole flowrate or decreasing hole dimensions lead to larger bubbles, whereas an increasing number of holes results in smaller bubbles detaching from the sparger.…”
Section: Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%