2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1268742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bubbles and Information: An Experiment

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

4
32
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results suggest that the effects of informational asymmetry on bubbles differ between CDAs and CMs. Specifically, informational asymmetry can contribute to the abatement of bubbles under CDAs as in Sutter et al (2012), while it can contribute to promoting bubbles under CMs. JEL classification: C91, G11…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The results suggest that the effects of informational asymmetry on bubbles differ between CDAs and CMs. Specifically, informational asymmetry can contribute to the abatement of bubbles under CDAs as in Sutter et al (2012), while it can contribute to promoting bubbles under CMs. JEL classification: C91, G11…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key feature of the experimental design of Sutter et al (2012) we would like to notice is that information about the realized prices and the limit orders of the other traders within the current period is available to all traders through the order book.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations