2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2010.07.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buchsbaumness of ordinary powers of two-dimensional square-free monomial ideals

Abstract: Let S = k[x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x n ] be a polynomial ring. Let I be a StanleyReisner ideal in S of a pure simplicial complex of dimension one. In this paper, we study the Buchsbaum property of S/I r for any integer r > 0. Our first purpose is giving a characterization of Ext-modules Ext p S (S/m t , S/ J ) for any monomial ideal J , where m t = (x t 1 , x t 2 , . . . , x t n ), in terms of certain simplicial complexes. Then we consider the Buchsbaum property of S/I r . The main tool to check the Buchsbaumness i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof. The equivalence of (1), (2), and (4) follows from [MT1,Corollary 3.4] and [MN2,Theorem 4.10]. The implication (1) ⇒ (3) follows from Proposition 3.4 and Lemma 4.1.…”
Section: §4 Ordinary Powersmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Proof. The equivalence of (1), (2), and (4) follows from [MT1,Corollary 3.4] and [MN2,Theorem 4.10]. The implication (1) ⇒ (3) follows from Proposition 3.4 and Lemma 4.1.…”
Section: §4 Ordinary Powersmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Research on the Cohen-Macaulay property of S/I (t) Δ and S/I t Δ was begun by [MT1] and [GH] for 1-dimensional simplicial complexes Δ. Then, by the authors, the Buchsbaum properties of S/I (t) Δ and S/I t Δ were studied in [MN1] and [MN2] for Δ with dim Δ = 1. Moreover, the k-Buchsbaum property of S/I (t) Δ was studied in [MN3].…”
Section: §1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two-dimensional squarefree monomial ideals attract many authors' interests. For example, the Buchsbaum property of symbolic powers and ordinary powers of these ideals was studied in [15] and [16], respectively, and the Cohen-Macaulayness of symbolic powers and ordinary powers of such ideals was characterized in terms of the properties of their associated graphs in [17]. Recently, the regularity of symbolic powers of such ideals was computed explicitly in [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above questions are of interest for what have been mentioned at the beginning, and here we answer them under the additional assumption that ∆ is a flag simplicial complex. Let us consider the first one: An answer to this question is already given in [MT2,Theorem 2.1] without the flag condition of ∆ (also see [MN1] and [MN2] for some special cases of the second part of this question). However, [MT2,Theorem 2.1] does not give a characterization in a combinatorial fashion, rather it involves the Cohen-Macaulayness of a family F of certain subcomplexes of ∆.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%