2021
DOI: 10.1080/17455030.2020.1871112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buckling analysis of restrained nanobeams using strain gradient elasticity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be seen from Eq. (24). It is interesting to note that third set frequency is 1.87 times of the first set frequency approximately.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This can be seen from Eq. (24). It is interesting to note that third set frequency is 1.87 times of the first set frequency approximately.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This fact can be seen from Eq. (24). More general vibration case can be obtained by setting all of the wave number integers to a nonzero value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent articles, it is seen that various solution methods, as in the generalized technique of differentiable quadrature, the Navier solution, separation of variables, the Ritz method, Stokes' transform, Fourier series, and the finite element method, attract attention. Previous studies in the literature provided examples of these methods [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. Various studies on free vibration analysis, one of the main subjects of our research, are also regularly featured in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Structures such as rods, beams, plates, and frames have recently been modeled at nano and micro scales and their various analyzes like static, vibration and buckling have been carried out based on the mentioned size dependent theories. Navier's method [5][6][7][8][9][10][11], Fourier sine solution [12][13][14][15][16][17], finite element method [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], separation of variable procedure [30,31], generalized differential quadrature method [32][33][34][35][36], Ritz method have been frequently used by scholars to present the mechanical responses of various small scale structures such as nanobeam, nanoframe, nanotruss, nanorod, nanoplate, cracked microbeam with functionally graded material, cracked nanobeam, functionally graded nanobeam, porous nanotube etc. The above-mentioned solution methods and others have been also utilized for macro-dimensional porous plate [37][38][39], porous beam [40,41], beam [42], reinforced plate [43,44], functionally graded and laminated beam [45]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%