2016
DOI: 10.1177/1687814016650341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buckling analysis of thin-walled members via semi-analytical finite strip transfer matrix method

Abstract: Slender thin-walled members are main components of modern engineering structures, whose buckling behavior has been studied widely. In this article, thin-walled members with simply supported loaded edges can be discretized in the cross-section by semi-analytical finite strip technology. Then, the control equations of the strip elements will be rewritten as the transfer equations by transfer matrix method. This new method, named as semi-analytical finite strip transfer matrix method, expands the advantages of se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the complicated profile shape (deep corrugations on the surface), an indirect method for detection of buckling and local instabilities formation was employed. The method is based on the observation of equilibrium path nonlinearities in the phase II pre-buckling elastic range instead of the classic approach [22][23][24][26][27][28][29][30] that relies on the determination of the plastic hinges' geometry. Phase I is a pre-buckling elastic range and ends when the yield strength f y = 337 MPa is achieved, transiting to the phase II pre-buckling elastoplastic range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because of the complicated profile shape (deep corrugations on the surface), an indirect method for detection of buckling and local instabilities formation was employed. The method is based on the observation of equilibrium path nonlinearities in the phase II pre-buckling elastic range instead of the classic approach [22][23][24][26][27][28][29][30] that relies on the determination of the plastic hinges' geometry. Phase I is a pre-buckling elastic range and ends when the yield strength f y = 337 MPa is achieved, transiting to the phase II pre-buckling elastoplastic range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The knowledge about the local instability formation mechanism is useful for predicting the entire structure's stability and load-carrying capacity and particularly useful for spotting the nature and place of damage. Scientific studies on the subject [26][27][28][29] have made a significant contribution to the development of science and technology, but they are usually related to flat-walled profiles of regular geometry. Determination of the failure mechanism becomes more complicated with irregular geometry such as the double-corrugated one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The transfer matrix method for multibody systems (MSTMM), which features no global dynamics equations, high programming, low order of system matrix, and high computational speed, is a powerful numerical analysis approach for multibody systems with various topological structures. 19 To further enhance the efficiency of SA-FSM in analyzing the buckling problem of thin-walled members, semi-analytical finite strip transfer matrix method (FSTMM) 20 was advanced by introducing MSTMM in SA-FSM. The method requires no global stiffness, thus greatly reduces the computational load while deriving all the benefit of SAFSM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A finite element-based solution was proposed by Pandeya and Singhb [ 54 ] to survey the free vibrational behavior of a fixed–free nanobeam with a varying cross-section. According to the Eringen nonlocal theory and Euler–Bernoulli beam model, the nonlinear vibration of AFG nanobeams with a tapered section was exploited by Shafiei et al [ 55 ], and a semi-analytical finite strip procedure was implemented by Zhang et al [ 56 , 57 ] for the study of the stability capacity of bars with an open and closed cross-section under an axial loading condition [ 56 ], accounting for the effect of lateral elastic braces on the overall stability response in Ref. [ 57 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%