2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buckling analysis of unitized curvilinearly stiffened composite panels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous researchers [34], [35] and [36] modeled curvilinear stiffeners using a parabolic curve. Using the parametric equation of the parabola and the start and the end point coordinates, one can obtain the three control points which could define the Bezier curve [40].…”
Section: A Three Point Parametrization Of the Curvilinear Stiffenermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous researchers [34], [35] and [36] modeled curvilinear stiffeners using a parabolic curve. Using the parametric equation of the parabola and the start and the end point coordinates, one can obtain the three control points which could define the Bezier curve [40].…”
Section: A Three Point Parametrization Of the Curvilinear Stiffenermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prusty and Satsangi [33] used the same algorithm to perform structural analysis of stiffened isotropic plates and shells. While the aforementioned authors studied straight stiffeners, curvilinearly stiffened panels were analyzed by Tamijani and Kapania [34], Zhao and Kapania [35] and Shi et al [36]. It has been found by Hao et al [37] that curvilinear stiffeners if used can improve the strength margins of panels since they reinforce the cutouts in them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stiffness distribution of the panel was influenced by the angle variation and the distance between the stiffeners. Kapania and his co-authors (see [20][21][22]) employed NURBS (Non-Uniform Rational B-Splines) to describe the reference path of curvilinear stiffeners. It was shown that curvilinear stiffeners could result in a better design than straight stiffeners, but not for all load cases and boundary conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this issue, finite element procedures were proposed in Refs. [26][27][28], where stiffeners displacements are expressed as function of those of the skin reference surface using finite element shape functions. In doing so, the generation of the models is made simpler: skin and stiffener elements can be generated independently from one another, and requirements in terms of shared nodes at the skin/stiffener interface need not be fulfilled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%