2010
DOI: 10.7312/mccr15094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buddhist Philosophy of Language in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This tradition contributed to what has been called an "epistemological turn" in Indian philosophy. [88] Through the work of Dharmakirti, this tradition of Buddhist logic has become the major epistemological system used in Tibetan Buddhist philosophy and debate. [89] After the disappearance of Buddhism from India, these philosophical traditions continued to develop in the Tibetan Buddhist, East Asian Buddhist, and Theravada Buddhist traditions.…”
Section: Ajñanamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This tradition contributed to what has been called an "epistemological turn" in Indian philosophy. [88] Through the work of Dharmakirti, this tradition of Buddhist logic has become the major epistemological system used in Tibetan Buddhist philosophy and debate. [89] After the disappearance of Buddhism from India, these philosophical traditions continued to develop in the Tibetan Buddhist, East Asian Buddhist, and Theravada Buddhist traditions.…”
Section: Ajñanamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But an additional negative element, exclusion, must be taken to be a qualifier of that positive object. While we can act only towards positive entities, it is only through exclusion that we can pick out the appropriate objects for that activity by distinguishing them from those that are inappropriate” (McCrea and Patil 2010 : 28).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has already been said. Therefore, establishing the position that words and inferential reasons have exclusions as their objects is for the sake of making it known that all properties are inexpressible” (McCrea and Patil 2010 : 96–97).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%