2017
DOI: 10.7175/fe.v18i1.1327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Budget impact analysis of dabigatran compared with rivaroxaban in the prevention of the thromboembolic risk in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Dabigatran 150 mg BID (D150) and rivaroxaban 20 mg (R20) are indicated for the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF). Outcomes from observational study demonstrated that D150 and R20 reduced the rate of thromboembolic events. OBJECTIVE: This analysis estimated the budget impact of the use of D150 and R20 for the treatment of NAFV patients in Italy. METHODS: A budget-impact model (BIM) was developed to estimate the direct costs up to 12 months f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, comparing the DOACs with each other can provide information for making the right treatment choice. Existing economic analyses [ 18–21 ] show favourable cost-effectiveness or cost savings by switching from VKA to DOAC-treatments or from one DOAC to another (e.g., rivaroxaban to dabigatran) [ 22 , 23 ] for AF-patients using standard (higher) doses. While the standard (higher) doses of AF-treatments with DOACs are well studied [ 18 ], the costs and health effects of lower-/reduced-dose DOACs still largely remain unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, comparing the DOACs with each other can provide information for making the right treatment choice. Existing economic analyses [ 18–21 ] show favourable cost-effectiveness or cost savings by switching from VKA to DOAC-treatments or from one DOAC to another (e.g., rivaroxaban to dabigatran) [ 22 , 23 ] for AF-patients using standard (higher) doses. While the standard (higher) doses of AF-treatments with DOACs are well studied [ 18 ], the costs and health effects of lower-/reduced-dose DOACs still largely remain unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%