Budget Uav Systems for the Prospection of Small- And Medium-Scale Archaeological Sites

Abstract

Commission I, ICWG I/VbKEY WORDS: Archaeology, Photogrammetry, UAV, UAS, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, Platforms, Mission Planning, Mapping ABSTRACT:One of the popular uses of UAVs in photogrammetry is providing an archaeological documentation. A wide offer of low-cost (consumer) grade UAVs, as well as the popularity of user-friendly photogrammetric software allowing obtaining satisfying results, contribute to facilitating the process of preparing documentation for small archaeological sites. However, using solutions of this kind is much more problematic for larger areas. The limited possibilities of autonomous flight makes it significantly harder to obtain data for areas too large to be covered during a single mission. Moreover, sometimes the platforms used are not equipped with telemetry systems, which makes navigating and guaranteeing a similar quality of data during separate flights difficult. The simplest solution is using a better UAV, however the cost of devices of such type often exceeds the financial capabilities of archaeological expeditions.The aim of this article is to present methodology allowing obtaining data for medium scale areas using only a basic UAV. The proposed methodology assumes using a simple multirotor, not equipped with any flight planning system or telemetry. Navigating of the platform is based solely on live-view images sent from the camera attached to the UAV. The presented survey was carried out using a simple GoPro camera which, from the perspective of photogrammetric use, was not the optimal configuration due to the fish eye geometry of the camera. Another limitation is the actual operational range of UAVs which in the case of cheaper systems, rarely exceeds 1 kilometre and is in fact often much smaller. Therefore the surveyed area must be divided into sub-blocks which correspond to the range of the drone. It is inconvenient since the blocks must overlap, so that they will later be merged during their processing. This increases the length of required flights as well as the computing power necessary to process a greater number of images.These issues make prospection highly inconvenient, but not impossible. Our paper presents our experiences through two case studies: surveys conducted in Nepal under the aegis of UNESCO, and works carried out as a part of a Polish archaeological expedition in Cyprus, which both prove that the proposed methodology allows obtaining satisfying results. The article is an important voice in the ongoing debate between commercial and academic archaeologists who discuss the balance between the required standards of conducting archaeological works and economic capabilities of archaeological missions.

Mapping the Inhospitable Landscapes of the Orkney Islands using RPAS

“…On both sites, a DJI Phantom 3 Advance RPAS was used. This RPAS is commonly used by archaeologists as it provides a good balance between cost and quality (compare Ostrowski & Hanus, ). One of the most important features of this RPAS is the onboard global positioning system (GPS) that provides georeferences for all the images taken during the flight.…”

UAV Photogrammetry and GIS Interpretations of Extended Archaeological Contexts: The Case of Tacuil in the Calchaquí Area (Argentina)

“…This approach could help for a better and more exhaustive understanding of settlements and urban/architectural patterns [5,6]. Photogrammetry enables researchers to obtain 3D products with metric and photorealistic content that is useful for archaeological applications both for site investigations [7] and the study of larger areas [8,9]. This method allows one to increase, in a very sensible way, the productivity on the field, compared with traditional methods used in archaeology; moreover, in many cases, the use of drones combined with terrestrial photogrammetry and laser scanning [10,11] allow researchers to perform topography even in difficult-to-reach sites [12].…”

Ancient Hermione revealed: the contribution of high‐performance computing and digital methods to the analysis of a hidden cityscape

“…An additional refinement in the field of 3D acquisition methods is constituted by the massive increase of air‐based computer vision techniques, which was made possible by the widespread of low‐budget aerial platforms, such as UAVs. These allow for a faster and more accurate documentation of large archaeological landscapes and urban complexes (Ostrowski & Hanus, 2016; Smith, Passone, Al‐Said, Al‐Farhan, & Levy, 2014; Stal, Lonneville, Nuttens, De Maeyer, & De Wulf, 2014; Verhoeven, 2011). There is undoubtedly great potential in the use of 3D models and they are deemed to play a major role in the archaeological documentation process although more experiments need to be conducted.…”