2012
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.6335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buffer gas modifiers effect resolution in ion mobility spectrometry through selective ion‐molecule clustering reactions

Abstract: RATIONALE When polar molecules (modifiers) are introduced into the buffer gas of an ion mobility spectrometer, most ion mobilities decrease due to the formation of ion-modifier clusters. METHODS We used ethyl lactate, nitrobenzene, 2-butanol, and tetrahydrofuran-2-carbonitrile as buffer gas modifiers and electrospray ionization ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) coupled to quadrupole mass spectrometry. Ethyl lactate, nitrobenzene, and tetrahydrofuran-2-carbonitrile had not been tested as buffer gas modifiers an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fernández-Maestre et al . 131, 132 have studied how the buffered gas modifiers affect resolution in ion mobility spectrometry through selective ion-molecule clustering reactions. Shvartsburg et al .…”
Section: Effects Of Experimental Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fernández-Maestre et al . 131, 132 have studied how the buffered gas modifiers affect resolution in ion mobility spectrometry through selective ion-molecule clustering reactions. Shvartsburg et al .…”
Section: Effects Of Experimental Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information on dopants and modifiers applications in order to detect different analytes with DT-IMS and DMS are summarized in Table 3. sulfur hexafluoride, nitrogen oxides [80] acetone positive control of proton transfer CWA [47] gas modifiers for DT-IMS chiral modifiers: S-(+)-2-butanol R-(-)-2-butanol positive changing of collision cross-section for ions moving in drift section, analyte-modifier cluster formation stereoisomers [90] ketones, e.g., 5-nonanone positive analyte-modifier cluster formation separation of hydrazines and ammonia [38] ammonia positive analyte-modifier cluster formation separation of amine derivatives, and 2,4-lutidine [28] nitrobenzene positive analyte-modifier cluster formation separation of amine derivatives [92,93] ethyl lactate positive analyte-modifier cluster formation separation of atenolol, arginine, histidine, lysine, caffeine, and glucosamine [91,92] methanol positive analyte-modifier cluster formation separation of TTEA, asparagine, and valine [94] gas modifiers for DMS polar modiefiers, e.g., isopropanol, methanol, acetone positive negative clustering-declustering control many different compounds, increasing peak capacity [97][98][99][100] isopropanol, 1-butanol, ethyl acetate positive clustering-declustering control DNA damage markers [101] alcohols, acetone, acetonitrile, positive clustering-declustering control separation of drugs and metabolites [102] benzene (nonpolar modifier) positive - modifier-to-analyte interaction improvement in the sensitivity and selectivity of DMS for detection of aromatic compounds [106] …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ketone vapors were introduced into the drift gas to separate ammonia from hydrazine [38]. The best separation was obtained when 5- carbonitrile, have also been studied [92]. Introducing the modifier vapors to the buffer gas resulted in ion-modifier clusters formation.…”
Section: Admixtures That Change the Drift Conditions In Dt-imsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that MS possesses advantages such as rapid analysis, high sensitivity, and reduced sample consumption; it also does not necessitate isotope labeling or other derivatization treatment to analytes. Currently, there are 4 major types of MS techniques used in chiral recognition: (1) the host‐guest method, (2) ion/molecule (equilibrium) reactions, (3) collision‐induced dissociation of diastereomeric complex (which includes the kinetic method [KM], the fixed ligand KM, and the chiral recognition ratio method) and (4) ion mobility MS . The most commonly used type is KM because the experimental data interpretation is much easier because only the relative abundances of 2 fragment ions are needed and isomer separation is not necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%