2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buffer strip width and agricultural pesticide contamination in Danish lowland streams: Implications for stream and riparian management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship between SPEAR and TU sensitive identified in the present study was similar to the dependencies reported in previous field studies with EDS applying SPEAR pesticides (Bereswill et al, 2013;Liess and von der Ohe, 2005;Rasmussen et al, 2011;Schäfer et al, 2007). Because of the lack of observations between TU ≤ −3.7 (no ecological effects) and TU ≥ -2.8 (impact of Carbofuran), the threshold for effective concentrations can be set to the mean of both values.…”
Section: Concentration-response Dependence and Compounds Responsible supporting
confidence: 66%
“…The relationship between SPEAR and TU sensitive identified in the present study was similar to the dependencies reported in previous field studies with EDS applying SPEAR pesticides (Bereswill et al, 2013;Liess and von der Ohe, 2005;Rasmussen et al, 2011;Schäfer et al, 2007). Because of the lack of observations between TU ≤ −3.7 (no ecological effects) and TU ≥ -2.8 (impact of Carbofuran), the threshold for effective concentrations can be set to the mean of both values.…”
Section: Concentration-response Dependence and Compounds Responsible supporting
confidence: 66%
“…A good part of the detected herbicides has long-lasting residual effects; thus, once in the soil, rainfalls promote the transportation of the product into groundwater (Paraiba et al, 2003). It is noteworthy that most of the water springs assessed were protected by woods and located in remote areas far from crops or at the top of the slopes, factors that hinder the entry of phytosanitary products in water (Rasmussen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A likely explanation for this is the scarcity of adjacent arable land and the frequent occurrence of riparian buffer strips. By including a minimum width for buffer strips in the RP model, Rasmussen et al (2011a) were able to increase the explanatory power of the model from 46% to 64%. However, the efficiency of buffer strips is still under discussion.…”
Section: No Significant Insecticidal Effects Of Diffuse Agricultural mentioning
confidence: 97%