“…Remarkably, the largest ECSA value of up to 161.5 m 2 g −1 was achieved for the Rh/ZIF–MX (1 : 1) electrode (Table S1†), followed by Rh/ZIF–MX (3 : 1) (137.8 m 2 g −1 ), Rh/ZIF–MX (1 : 3) (130.1 m 2 g −1 ), Rh/ZIF–MX (5 : 1) (116.4 m 2 g −1 ), and Rh/ZIF–MX (1 : 5) (90.2 m 2 g −1 ). Meanwhile, the Rh/ZIF–MX (1 : 1) electrode also exhibited a remarkably large ECSA value compared with those of conventional Rh/RGO (62.1 m 2 g −1 ), Rh/CNT (41.7 m 2 g −1 ), and Rh/C (39.2 m 2 g −1 ), as well as the recent state-of-the-art Rh-based nanostructures, such as Rh nanosheets, 42,43 Rh nanotubes, 44 Rh nanodendrites, 45 Rh/carbon nanohorns, 46 Rh/CNT–RGO, 47 and Rh/MoS 2 –RGO 48 (Fig. 4b, c and Table S2†), indicating that the newly-designed ZIF/MX matrix with a rational composition was able to expose more Rh active sites than those in previously known materials.…”