2021
DOI: 10.1108/jea-08-2020-0188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building a climate of faculty trust in students through principal support of student psychological needs

Abstract: PurposeThis study was designed to test the relationship between principal support of student psychological needs and faculty trust in students. Without direct empirical evidence to draw from, the line of reasoning integrated evidence on social-cognitive processes involved in trust formation and conversation theory to advance two hypotheses: (1) After accounting for school and leadership conditions, principal support of student psychological needs will be related to school differences in faculty trust in studen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conceptual facets of trust-that is, categorical perceptions of another's benevolence, reliability, competence, honesty, and openness-are consistent with the underlying conceptual foundations of organizational justice-equity, equality, voice, fairness, dignity, and consistency (Hoy & Tarter, 2004). In the past 35 years, scholars have examined the affective, behavioral, and cognitive mechanisms that generate trust in schools, the schoollevel consequences of trust, and the different trustee groups such as teacher trust in their principal, in students, parents, district administration, and colleagues, as well as parent trust in schools (Adams, 2014;Adams & Adigun, 2021;2007;. There are two sets of norms to be cognizant of here.…”
Section: Trust In Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conceptual facets of trust-that is, categorical perceptions of another's benevolence, reliability, competence, honesty, and openness-are consistent with the underlying conceptual foundations of organizational justice-equity, equality, voice, fairness, dignity, and consistency (Hoy & Tarter, 2004). In the past 35 years, scholars have examined the affective, behavioral, and cognitive mechanisms that generate trust in schools, the schoollevel consequences of trust, and the different trustee groups such as teacher trust in their principal, in students, parents, district administration, and colleagues, as well as parent trust in schools (Adams, 2014;Adams & Adigun, 2021;2007;. There are two sets of norms to be cognizant of here.…”
Section: Trust In Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%