2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building a culture of responsible neurotech: Neuroethics as socio-technical challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ideas from the "Internet of Things" have led to active medication inhalers that measure and report their use [19], giving rise to ethical concerns and, as with other remote monitoring, to questions of technology acceptance [20]. Such questions arise even more sharply in the field of neuroengineering [21], e.g., of brain implants for device or prosthesis control. At a more abstract level, attention has focused on cognitive tools, decision support, design of apps, and questions of attention span and mental workload [22][23][24].…”
Section: Design Personal Health Records Decision Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideas from the "Internet of Things" have led to active medication inhalers that measure and report their use [19], giving rise to ethical concerns and, as with other remote monitoring, to questions of technology acceptance [20]. Such questions arise even more sharply in the field of neuroengineering [21], e.g., of brain implants for device or prosthesis control. At a more abstract level, attention has focused on cognitive tools, decision support, design of apps, and questions of attention span and mental workload [22][23][24].…”
Section: Design Personal Health Records Decision Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers should advocate for more inclusive technology for all hair textures and styles (Robinson et al, 2022).…”
Section: Eeg-specific Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dr Rommelfanger concludes the podcast by discussing the clinicians' role in helping patients understand the utility and limits of commercially available BCI technologies and advocating for greater clinician involvement in BCI development. 3 She suggests that clinicians familiarize themselves with information from the Institute of Neuroethics Think and Do Tank (see Institute of Neuroethics Guidance), International Neuroethics Society, and the Dana Foundation to educate patients and fellow clinicians attempting to navigate this field in applied and practical neuroethics and related policy. 4,5 On a societal level, she points to a role for physicians in promoting access and medical reimbursement of BCI technologies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%