IJM 2015
DOI: 10.34196/ijm.00146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building a Microsimulation Model of Heroin Use Careers in Australia

Abstract: Illicit heroin use is a worldwide problem, with significant health and social costs. Treatment is known to be effective in changing heroin use habits, but it often needs to be provided over a lifetime, with people cycling in and out of treatment. It is therefore important to

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This challenge is especially present when attempting to model a population, such as people who use heroin, whose behaviors are parameterized with high uncertainty over a long time horizon. 37,47 Other cost-related challenges appeared, for instance, in measuring the quantities of drug-free therapy and detoxification services received, 37 differences in cost estimation methods between methadone and buprenorphine treatments, 42 and missing societal-relevant costs such as lost wages in the societal perspective. 47 When performed, sensitivity analyses help resolve these concerns in part by showing that varying the cost inputs did not alter the results drastically 37 -although interpretation is complicated by the lack of a standard, generally acceptable threshold of willingness to pay for some outcomes such as additional patients retained in treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This challenge is especially present when attempting to model a population, such as people who use heroin, whose behaviors are parameterized with high uncertainty over a long time horizon. 37,47 Other cost-related challenges appeared, for instance, in measuring the quantities of drug-free therapy and detoxification services received, 37 differences in cost estimation methods between methadone and buprenorphine treatments, 42 and missing societal-relevant costs such as lost wages in the societal perspective. 47 When performed, sensitivity analyses help resolve these concerns in part by showing that varying the cost inputs did not alter the results drastically 37 -although interpretation is complicated by the lack of a standard, generally acceptable threshold of willingness to pay for some outcomes such as additional patients retained in treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37,47 Other cost-related challenges appeared, for instance, in measuring the quantities of drug-free therapy and detoxification services received, 37 differences in cost estimation methods between methadone and buprenorphine treatments, 42 and missing societal-relevant costs such as lost wages in the societal perspective. 47 When performed, sensitivity analyses help resolve these concerns in part by showing that varying the cost inputs did not alter the results drastically 37 -although interpretation is complicated by the lack of a standard, generally acceptable threshold of willingness to pay for some outcomes such as additional patients retained in treatment. 42 The topical scope of the studies covered 6 main analyses of cost-effectiveness: methadone expansion; comparisons of different medications for opioid use disorder (methadone, buprenorphine, injectable naltrexone, and, in one study, medically prescribed diacetylmorphine [ie, the active ingredient in heroin]); comparisons of modes of medication delivery (eg, sublingual vs subdermal buprenorphine-naloxone); comparisons of medications to treatment without medications; abuse-deterrent versus non-abuse-deterrent opioid prescribing; and comparisons of different naloxone distribution strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations