2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11747-017-0552-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building a multi-category brand: when should distant brand extensions be introduced?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, high brand equity induces conflict between what is expected from the brand and what is associated with the design (e.g., “It is a BMW, but it also looks like other competitors”). This argument is in line with recent research on brand extensions by Parker et al (2018), which shows that when brand categorization is difficult, brand evaluation decreases. Therefore, P 2 : Both RS and ED reduce the impact of segment typicality on demand such that higher levels of RS and ED result in a less positive impact of segment typicality. …”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Thus, high brand equity induces conflict between what is expected from the brand and what is associated with the design (e.g., “It is a BMW, but it also looks like other competitors”). This argument is in line with recent research on brand extensions by Parker et al (2018), which shows that when brand categorization is difficult, brand evaluation decreases. Therefore, P 2 : Both RS and ED reduce the impact of segment typicality on demand such that higher levels of RS and ED result in a less positive impact of segment typicality. …”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our findings contribute to a better understanding of brand extension evaluations by showing that life-role transition, a seemingly unrelated life event that consumers undergo when evaluating a brand extension, plays a critical role in determining responses toward distant brand extensions. In so doing, our research contributes to an emerging body of research that calls for a better understanding of how consumers evaluate brand extensions, especially distant brand extensions, in realistic marketplace conditions (Cutright, Bettman, and Fitzsimons 2013;Johnson et al 2019;Klink and Smith 2001;Meyvis, Goldsmith, and Dhar 2012;Parker et al 2018), and it reveals that consumers' product preferences can be grounded in their life dynamics. Last, our findings provide practical suggestions for brand managers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Brand extension occurs when an established brand uses its name to enter a different product category (Keller and Aaker 1992). This is a popular way to introduce new products into the market because companies can leverage their existing brand equity, and it has therefore gained a lot of attention (e.g., Chun et al 2015;Meyvis, Goldsmith, and Dhar 2012;Monga and Gurhan-Canli 2012;Parker et al 2018). The most important factor that influences brand extension evaluation is perceived fit, which is the overall similarity between a brand extension and the parent brand (Keller and Aaker 1992;Völckner and Sattler 2006).…”
Section: Brand Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another important area of research within this theme relates to brand extensions (e.g. Parker et al 2018). This includes issue related to how mental associations are created in consumers' minds, and how they affect brand extension evaluations based on the parent brandextension fit (Miniard et al 2018).…”
Section: Text Mining Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%