2010
DOI: 10.1080/15544771003697213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building a Theory, Measuring a Concept: Exploring Intersectionality and Latina Activism at the Individual Level

Abstract: Untangling the complexities of intersecting identities at the microlevel is important to our studies of political participation. In the following article I propose a typology whereby the intersectionality of gender and ethnic identity may be disaggregated along individualistic and collectivistic dimensions. Using group interviews, I find that collectivistic orientations of intersecting gender and ethnic identity mobilize Latinas into political activism. However, an individualistic orientation of gender or ethn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future research should expand to groups with different gender and racial histories. Latina, Asian American, and Native women, for example, all have unique cultural understandings for what it means to be and to feel connected to other women (Chow 1987; Jacobs, Thomas, and Lang 1997; Jaramillo 2010; Reyes 2016). It is also worth exploring whether gender-linked fate is stronger for more specific groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research should expand to groups with different gender and racial histories. Latina, Asian American, and Native women, for example, all have unique cultural understandings for what it means to be and to feel connected to other women (Chow 1987; Jacobs, Thomas, and Lang 1997; Jaramillo 2010; Reyes 2016). It is also worth exploring whether gender-linked fate is stronger for more specific groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, the interaction of the unique identities of minority women may lead to entirely different outcomes than those observed for Anglo women or minority men. Existing research indicates that the multiple identities balanced by minority women often produce a unique impact on many facets of political life, including campaigns, elections, policy making, representation, political behavior, and political attitudes (Crenshaw 1989, 1991; Gay and Tate 1998; Hawkesworth 2003; Hughs 2007; Jaramillo, forthcoming; Philpot and Walton 2007; Simien 2007; Simien and Clawson 2004; Smooth 2006). As these and other scholars indicate, minority women running for and holding elective office may be “doubly disadvantaged,” struggling to build electoral support, particularly among Anglos (Moncrief, Thompson, and Schulmann 1991; Philpot and Walton 2007).…”
Section: Previous Research and Theoretical Expectationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intersectionality, originally defined by Crenshaw (1991) as intersecting identities of gender and race that shaped the experiences and oppression of black women, has since been discussed more broadly by acknowledging additional identity categories that intersect with race and gender. According to Hanvinsky et al (2010, p. 1), intersectionality “places an explicit focus on differences among groups and seeks to illuminate various interacting social factors that affect human lives, including social locations, health status, and quality of life.” The proponents of intersectionality theory promote its value as an interpretive tool, as an analytic method that is conducive to understanding power relations in social movements (Cole, 2008; Egeland & Gressgard, 2007; Hanvinsky et al, 2010; Jaramillo, 2010; Samuels & Ross-Sheriff, 2008; Yuval-Davis, 2006). The value of using intersectionality to analyze women’s experiences with power is that it not only draws attention to difference but invites individual interpretations of those differences.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%