“…For this motive, YouTube has been extensively used as a data source, covering such topics as the specific features of science videos (Morcillo, et al, 2016;Welbourne and Grant, 2016), the output-level impact of science videos Yang, et al, 2022), the characteristics of science video presenters , analyses of science video comments (Tsou, et al, 2014;Striewski, et al, 2022), gender studies (Thelwall and Mas-Bleda, 2018;Amarasekara and Grant, 2019), categories of science videos (Kousha, et al, 2012), science video audiences (Boy, et al, 2020), best practices in making science videos (Beautemps and Bresges, 2021;Elberzhager, et al, 2022) or promoting research projects (Davies, 2019), and discussions centred on controversial issues, such as fracking (Jaspal, et al, 2014), genomics (Harris, et al, 2014), vaccination (Donzelli, et al, 2018), climate change (Shapiro and Park, 2015;Allgaier, 2019) and the COVID-19 pandemic (Orduña-Malea, et al, 2020). In addition, the use of YouTube by research organizations, especially universities (Martín-González and Llarena, 2017;Meseguer-Martinez, et al, 2019;Ros-Gálvez, et al, 2021).…”