2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-14343-4_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building a YouTube Channel for Science Communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a global, online video-sharing service (primarily oriented to pre-recorded content), the use of YouTube as a platform for the dissemination of science has increased notably (Amarasekara and Grant, 2019;Shaikh, et al, 2023;Yang, et al, 2022). Its international and inter-generational audiences (Thelwall, 2018), diverse content (Striewski, et al, 2022), social media features (Tsou, et al, 2014;Allgaier, 2020;Shaikh, et al, 2023), permanent access (Elberzhager, et al, 2022) and reach (Maynard, 2021) mean YouTube is a suitable tool for social media academic metrics, or "popularity" metrics (Yang, et al, 2022).…”
Section: Science Videos As Social Media Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a global, online video-sharing service (primarily oriented to pre-recorded content), the use of YouTube as a platform for the dissemination of science has increased notably (Amarasekara and Grant, 2019;Shaikh, et al, 2023;Yang, et al, 2022). Its international and inter-generational audiences (Thelwall, 2018), diverse content (Striewski, et al, 2022), social media features (Tsou, et al, 2014;Allgaier, 2020;Shaikh, et al, 2023), permanent access (Elberzhager, et al, 2022) and reach (Maynard, 2021) mean YouTube is a suitable tool for social media academic metrics, or "popularity" metrics (Yang, et al, 2022).…”
Section: Science Videos As Social Media Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this motive, YouTube has been extensively used as a data source, covering such topics as the specific features of science videos (Morcillo, et al, 2016;Welbourne and Grant, 2016), the output-level impact of science videos Yang, et al, 2022), the characteristics of science video presenters , analyses of science video comments (Tsou, et al, 2014;Striewski, et al, 2022), gender studies (Thelwall and Mas-Bleda, 2018;Amarasekara and Grant, 2019), categories of science videos (Kousha, et al, 2012), science video audiences (Boy, et al, 2020), best practices in making science videos (Beautemps and Bresges, 2021;Elberzhager, et al, 2022) or promoting research projects (Davies, 2019), and discussions centred on controversial issues, such as fracking (Jaspal, et al, 2014), genomics (Harris, et al, 2014), vaccination (Donzelli, et al, 2018), climate change (Shapiro and Park, 2015;Allgaier, 2019) and the COVID-19 pandemic (Orduña-Malea, et al, 2020). In addition, the use of YouTube by research organizations, especially universities (Martín-González and Llarena, 2017;Meseguer-Martinez, et al, 2019;Ros-Gálvez, et al, 2021).…”
Section: Science Videos As Social Media Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%