1999
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0097911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building an adaptive multimedia system using the utility model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the increment Δ , * → to the Lagrange multiplier of the radio constraint can be computed as: (29) [25], the user * and candidate BS * causing the least increase of the corresponding multiplier is chosen for exchange (lines [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] as this choice minimizes the gap between the optimal solution characterized by (26) and the new assignment solution obtained at this point. However, if the multiplier increase is just computed as the equality as done in [25], important convergence problems arise since users tend to have the same weighted utility towards multiple BSs.…”
Section: B Description Of the Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, the increment Δ , * → to the Lagrange multiplier of the radio constraint can be computed as: (29) [25], the user * and candidate BS * causing the least increase of the corresponding multiplier is chosen for exchange (lines [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] as this choice minimizes the gap between the optimal solution characterized by (26) and the new assignment solution obtained at this point. However, if the multiplier increase is just computed as the equality as done in [25], important convergence problems arise since users tend to have the same weighted utility towards multiple BSs.…”
Section: B Description Of the Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formulated optimization problem is based on utility and resource cost concepts, which have been widely used to develop resource allocation algorithms [19]. The second contribution is the mapping, after some practical considerations, of the BS assignment problem to a Multiple-Choice Multidimensional Knapsack Problem (MMKP), a well-known NP-hard combinatorial optimization problem arisen in many practical and real life problems [20], [21]. Motivated by the need to obtain suboptimal solutions with polynomial time complexity, the third contribution is the derivation of a heuristic backhaulaware BS assignment algorithm along with its performance comparison respect to classical schemes entirely based on radio conditions.…”
Section: B Our Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our problem several items of the same type can be chosen, depending on the combination and subcombination patterns. MMKP is NP-hard, so it would not be efficient to apply an exact method to solve it, especially for a real-time decision making application (Chen et al, 1999). Recent heuristic approaches use various techniques, such as Local Search (Hifi et al, 2004;Hifi et al, 2006), Tabu Search and Ant Colony Optimization (Lau and Lim, 2004), or reductions of the search space (Akbar et al, 2006), etc.…”
Section: Links With Other Optimization Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MMKP is an N P-hard optimization problem (as a generalization of the single Knapsack Problem KP) which models many practical and real life problems. We cite the problem of quality adaptation and admission control for interactive multimedia systems (Chen et al, 1999), or service level agreement management in telecommunication networks problems (Watson, 2001). In the MMKP, we are given a set N of items divided into n classes J i , where each class J i , i = 1, .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%