2018
DOI: 10.1080/20421338.2018.1436737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building an innovation system and indigenous knowledge in Namibia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While careful consideration is needed when models originating from the Global North are applied to the Global South's rural contexts (see Saarinen & Lenao, 2014), particularly the focus on the civil society, communality and third‐sector associations inherent in vitality policy is an apt development approach also for regions with less resources. Additionally, embedding indigenous knowledge––that is, locally embedded knowledge that is unique to a given community––in vitality policy (in addition to the focus on place‐based strengths and resources) would help to adjust the concept into the local contexts of the Global South, since indigenous knowledge facilitates the participatory development processes of local communities (see Hooli & Jauhiainen, 2018; Jauhiainen & Hooli, 2017). At the same time, it can be stated that vitality policy does not necessarily need to be limited to rural development issues.…”
Section: Discussion: the Wider Applicability Novelty And Feasibility Of Vitality Policy?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While careful consideration is needed when models originating from the Global North are applied to the Global South's rural contexts (see Saarinen & Lenao, 2014), particularly the focus on the civil society, communality and third‐sector associations inherent in vitality policy is an apt development approach also for regions with less resources. Additionally, embedding indigenous knowledge––that is, locally embedded knowledge that is unique to a given community––in vitality policy (in addition to the focus on place‐based strengths and resources) would help to adjust the concept into the local contexts of the Global South, since indigenous knowledge facilitates the participatory development processes of local communities (see Hooli & Jauhiainen, 2018; Jauhiainen & Hooli, 2017). At the same time, it can be stated that vitality policy does not necessarily need to be limited to rural development issues.…”
Section: Discussion: the Wider Applicability Novelty And Feasibility Of Vitality Policy?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mwantimwa, 2008), is well suited for a context such as South Africa, where rural communities mostly rely on traditional expressions and practices (Jauhiainen and Hooli, 2017). The strategy also supports the potential for scaling-up innovative Indigenous approaches and could assist in empowering local communities and providing much needed new sustainable economic opportunities (Hooli and Jauhiainen, 2018). Although considered economically marginal and typically ignored in national decision-making (Shackleton 2009;Laird et al, 2010), plant material is often used for craft making (weaving), and is an important element for rural communities, in terms of livelihoods, Indigenous knowledge and heritage (Kepe 2003;Makhado and Kepe, 2006;Traynor et al, 2010;Kotze & Traynor 2011).…”
Section: The Indigenous Marine Innovations For Sustainable Environmen...mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Combined analytical and context-specific knowledge has a stronger influence on the project output than either of them alone (Parrilli and Heras 2016). Beyond the limited contextual understanding amongst experts from the Global North, a common challenge is that actors from the Global South often lack the absorptive capacity to utilise analytical knowledge handed down by foreign experts and may not have the resources to take advantage of the latest technological equipment (Cohen and Levinthal 1990;Hooli and Jauhiainen 2018). Therefore, the contextualisation of knowledge requires extra recognition of cognitive processes between various actors and their personal interpretations (Hautala and Jauhiainen 2014).…”
Section: Knowledge Creation Processes In Development Cooperationmentioning
confidence: 99%