2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.elerap.2005.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building an operational product ontology system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…practices to avoid, rather than practices to emulate, as can be seen elsewhere beyond the domain of government. For example, a case study of the development of an ontology to support the interoperability of electronic product catalogues takes the reader through the stages of domain analysis, modelling entities in the domain, and establishing relationships between entities [21]. A close reading of the work reveals, however, that the building of the ontology appears to have been a means of arriving at a relational database schema, not least because the goal of the exercise was to build an operational procurement catalogue.…”
Section: Theory and Practice Of Ontological Development As Published mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…practices to avoid, rather than practices to emulate, as can be seen elsewhere beyond the domain of government. For example, a case study of the development of an ontology to support the interoperability of electronic product catalogues takes the reader through the stages of domain analysis, modelling entities in the domain, and establishing relationships between entities [21]. A close reading of the work reveals, however, that the building of the ontology appears to have been a means of arriving at a relational database schema, not least because the goal of the exercise was to build an operational procurement catalogue.…”
Section: Theory and Practice Of Ontological Development As Published mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The semantics of representing products and services themselves is now pretty well understood, and there exist prototypes from controlled B2B settings [4][5][6] and general products and services ontologies in the official ontology languages for the Semantic Web, namely eClassOWL [7] and a similar ontology unspscOWL, which is awaiting copyright clearance. However, all of these components alone do not yet provide the means required for e-commerce on the Semantic Web.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In short, we currently lack a non-toy ontology that allows describing the relationship between (1) Web resources, (2) offerings made by means of those Web resources, (3) legal entities, (4) prices, (5) terms and conditions, and the aforementioned ontologies for products and services (6).…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attributes of a model for electronic catalogs has been numerated in [11] and then semantic model has been proposed for classifying products in catalogs. This model was used as a reference model for implementing product ontologies [12]. In this implementation, ontology model has been mapped to relational databases.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%