I'UMK reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average I hour per response, including the lime lor reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing thi-. collection of information Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden
PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS)ES)RESIDENCY SITE ADDRESS lOOBrewsterBlvd Camp Lejeune. NC 28547
PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT <). SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)US
II. SPONSOR/MONITORS REPORT M MBER(S) 32-08
II D1STRIBITION / A\ A1LABILITY STATEMENTApproved for public release: distribution is unlimited
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
ABSTRACTThe purpose of this paper is to identify core competencies and important skills, knowledge, and abilities (SKAs) required by junior Navy Medical Service Corps officers to be successful in the next five to ten years. In addition, this study tested similarities and differences among responses within subspecialty groups of the Medical Service Corps including: Administrators. Scientists, and Clinicians. Two waves of the Delphi technique were employed. In Wave I, junior Navy Medical Service Corps officers identified the five most important competencies and their important SKAs. An expert panel of six Lieutenant Commanders reviewed, sorted, and identified competencies from Wave I into 11 domains. From the expert analysis, the researcher developed a questionnaire for use in Delphi technique, Wave II. In Wave II, junior Navy Medical Service Corps officers rated the SKAs from each domain based on importance. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to test similarities and differences between responses and among subspecialty groups within the Medical Service Corps. Results indicated that Core Values, Leadership traits, subspecialty expertise and operational understanding were most critical for junior Medical Service Corps officer in the next five to ten years. Many similar opinions merged among the Administrators and Scientists suggesting that although these two subspecialty groups evolved from different educational and professional backgrounds, they share similar opinions on success in the Corps today. In contrast. Clinicians and Administrators shared in only one opinion, the importance of Subspecialty Expertise. Once statistical interaction between groups was revealed, post hoc tests were conducted to determine a significant difference of opinion. Results revealed that Clinicians Vs. Others have a real difference of opinion with 36 of 100 SKAs significant. Administrators Vs. Others showed 11 of 100 SKAs statistically different. Scientists Vs. Others showed no statistically significant difference. 10 out of the 15 lowest rated SKAs were found within all three subspecialty groups of the Medical Service Corps suggesting that although there is widely varied opinion among subspecialties of SKAs required for success, respondent...