Building Armies, Building Nations: Toward a New Approach to Security Force Assistance

Abstract

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest.RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication.ISBN: 978-0-8330-9741-5 For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1832Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2017 RAND CorporationR® is a registered trademark.iii PrefaceThis report explores the relationship between armies and nation-building and argues that U.S.-sponsored Security Force Assistance (SFA) might be improved were there less focus on force structure, military capabilities, and readiness, and more on ideology and the extent to which an army complements a host nation's larger nation-building project. While SFA doctrine and comparable guidelines call for working toward enhancing government legitimacy, this report argues that legitimacy is often a function of ideas, identities, and ideologies. Armies historically have played an important role by embodying and promoting specific ideas, identities, and ideologies, and otherwise by bridging the people with the nation. This report uses six case studies-three historic cases of large-scale U.S. SFA programs (South Korea, Vietnam, and Iraq) and three cases of attempts by postcolonial states (Ghana, Mali, and Nigeria) to invent themselves, with the military sometimes playing an important role-for the purpose of examining relationships between armies and nation-building and the potential role of SFA.The purpose of this report is to identify ways to improve SFA provision. Recent events in Iraq as well as Mali have raised questions about the value of SFA and U.S. capacity to strengthen client states' militaries in the face of insurgencies or other significant threats. While stopping short of policy prescription, this report is intended to suggest possible improvements to SFA by arguing for a different approach as well as to stimulate further debate and research.This research was sponsored by the Deputy Chief of Staff G-8, Army Quadrennial Defense Review Office, and conducted within the SummarySecurity Force Assistance (S...

Legislation on conscription: comparative analysis

“…In the research of Frederick, B., (Shurkin, M., Gordon IV, J., Frederick, B., & Pernin, C.G.) the following types of military service are distinguished: 1) regular military service; 2) military service by conscription during mobilisation, for a special period; 3) military service under the contract of privates; 4) military service under the contract of sergeants and sergeants; 5) military service (training) of cadets of higher military educational institutions, as well as higher educational institutions having military institutes, faculties of military training, departments of military training, departments of military training (hereinafter -higher military educational institutions and military educational institutions) [14].…”

The Iraqi Kurdish Peshmerga: military reform and nation-building in a divided polity

“…We situate our analysis in recent literature on external efforts to support the reform of countries' armed forces or what in official US terminology is referred to as security assistance. This literature argues that external efforts to support military reform have tended to be technical in nature (focusing on training, the provision of equipment and combat effectiveness) and have ignored or downplayed the larger political challenges involved in military reform, in particular the problems of nation-building (Karlin 2017(Karlin , 2018Shurkin et al 2018). As a consequence, externally backed military reform efforts often fail because they do not address underlying political questions about the control and function of armed forces.…”