2018
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2018.2829700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building Autonomic Optical Whitebox-Based Networks

Abstract: Disaggregation at the optical layer is expected to bring benefits to network operators by enriching the offering of available solutions and enabling the deployment of optical nodes that better fit their needs. In this paper, we assume a partially disaggregated model with transponder nodes for transmission and ROADMs for switching, where each optical node is conceived as a whitebox consisting of a set of optical devices and a local node controller that exposes a single interface to the SDN controller. An archit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aiming at emulating failure scenarios, we modify the characteristics of the 2 nd WSS of each node (from N1 to N8) in the set-up; its bandwidth and central frequency are modified to model FT and FS failures, respectively. A large dataset of failures was collected by inducing failures of magnitude in the range [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] GHz for FS and in the range [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] GHz for FT, both with 0.25 GHz step-size, where the magnitude of FT is defined as the difference between the ideal bandwidth of the filter (37.5 GHz) and its actual bandwidth during the failure.…”
Section: A Vpi Set-up For Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Aiming at emulating failure scenarios, we modify the characteristics of the 2 nd WSS of each node (from N1 to N8) in the set-up; its bandwidth and central frequency are modified to model FT and FS failures, respectively. A large dataset of failures was collected by inducing failures of magnitude in the range [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] GHz for FS and in the range [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] GHz for FT, both with 0.25 GHz step-size, where the magnitude of FT is defined as the difference between the ideal bandwidth of the filter (37.5 GHz) and its actual bandwidth during the failure.…”
Section: A Vpi Set-up For Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following such idea, the authors in [9] and [10] proposed a distributed Monitoring and Data Analytics (MDA) framework that includes MDA agents running close to the observation points in the network nodes, as well as a centralized MDA controller running in the control and management plane besides the Software Defined Networking (SDN) controller. Such MDA framework is the base to build autonomic optical networks, especially in the case of utilizing white boxes which might include specific optical monitoring devices [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these problems, the distributed architecture (Fig. 2b) includes MDA agents in charge of collecting measurements from a single node, while keeping the MDA controller centralized [12,13]. The MDA agent exposes two unified interfaces toward the MDA controller for collecting data and monitoring the configuration.…”
Section: Mda Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distributed architecture includes a dedicated MDA agent for every node in the network, which might present some limitations when disaggregated optical network nodes (e.g., TPs and [13]. For this reason, the hierarchical architecture (Fig.…”
Section: Mda Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behind the autonomic concept, machine learning (ML) plays an essential role for a wide range of use cases in optical networks (see [3][4][5][6][7]). Examples include use cases from self-configuration to predictive maintenance and, at several levels, from transmission to single and multilayer network [8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%