2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2005.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building bridges for resource acquisition: Network relationships among headteachers in Ugandan private secondary schools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
11
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The significance of collaborative structures and social networks for successful school improvement and continuous teacher development is underlined by studies on educational reform and school change across the globe, such as southeast Asia (Hallinger, 1998), Australia (Hollingsworth, 2004), the Netherlands (Moolenaar, Sleegers and Zijlstra, 2009;Moolenaar, Daly, and Sleegers, 2009;Veugelers and Zijlstra, 2002), Portugal (Lima, 2007(Lima, , 2009, Uganda (Hite et al, 2006), the United Kingdom (Durrant and Holden, 2006;Earl and Katz, 2007;Hargreaves, 2001Hargreaves, , 2003Hopkins and Reynolds, 2001), and the United States (Daly and Finnigan, 2009). Whether in the form of communities of practice (Wenger, 1998), learning organizations (Senge, 2006), professional learning communities (McLaughin and Talbert, 1993;Newmann and Wehlage, 1995;Stoll and Louis, 2007), or distributed leadership (Spillane, 2006), the social context, and in particular increased social interaction among all of the school's stakeholders, is believed to be at the heart of system reform and school improvement.…”
Section: District Reform and Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significance of collaborative structures and social networks for successful school improvement and continuous teacher development is underlined by studies on educational reform and school change across the globe, such as southeast Asia (Hallinger, 1998), Australia (Hollingsworth, 2004), the Netherlands (Moolenaar, Sleegers and Zijlstra, 2009;Moolenaar, Daly, and Sleegers, 2009;Veugelers and Zijlstra, 2002), Portugal (Lima, 2007(Lima, , 2009, Uganda (Hite et al, 2006), the United Kingdom (Durrant and Holden, 2006;Earl and Katz, 2007;Hargreaves, 2001Hargreaves, , 2003Hopkins and Reynolds, 2001), and the United States (Daly and Finnigan, 2009). Whether in the form of communities of practice (Wenger, 1998), learning organizations (Senge, 2006), professional learning communities (McLaughin and Talbert, 1993;Newmann and Wehlage, 1995;Stoll and Louis, 2007), or distributed leadership (Spillane, 2006), the social context, and in particular increased social interaction among all of the school's stakeholders, is believed to be at the heart of system reform and school improvement.…”
Section: District Reform and Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defined by teachers as 'moving out' from your primary job [4] to teach at additional schools for part-time pay, moonlighting has traditionally provided teachers with income-generating opportunities. At the institutional level, moonlighting provides resource-sharing opportunities between schools (Hite et al, 2006). In effect, moonlighting helps schools to maintain teaching staff in high-need tested subjects such as physics and mathematics by redistributing high-demand teachers' time between needy schools.…”
Section: Moonlighting: Informal Policy and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Hite et al (2006) show that teacher resource sharing can be productive to many schools through the creation of resource-sharing networks, the way in which moonlighting plays out at teachers' primary job location shows evidence of the system-wide damage that is tied to moonlighting activities, in particular teacher absenteeism. In practice, moonlighting effectively removes teachers from the school in which they are paid to perform, leaving gaps in lesson coverage.…”
Section: Moonlighting: Informal Policy and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At schools, head teachers’ actions are among the many interpersonal factors that can influence the school environment for children and, potentially, for their parents and other teachers. Head teachers are centrally positioned to promote nutrition in schools and their communities, often supporting nutrition interventions led by government and development partners [ 5 , 6 ]. Nonetheless, the ability of teachers and heads to influence healthy behaviours at schools might be limited by their knowledge of and attitudes towards nutrition [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%