2016
DOI: 10.1177/0306624x15598959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building Bridges in New Jersey

Abstract: This article describes the experience and outcomes of the National Institute on Drug Abuse-funded Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies 2 Improving Best Practices in Assessment and Case Planning for Offenders protocol in the state of New Jersey. The protocol was designed to test the effectiveness of an Organizational Process Improvement Intervention in improving four assessment and case planning domains for drug-involved offenders in correctional settings transferring to community treatment based agenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interviews with VJP specialists regarding their perceptions of the implementation potential of treatments for recidivism in VHA provide some insights by highlighting cross-service (e.g., VJP and behavioral health) and cross-system (e.g., healthcare and criminal justice system) partnerships as potential facilitators to MRT implementation in this noncorrectional setting (Blonigen et al 2018a). The broader literature on implementation of evidence-based practices for justice-involved populations also point to facility characteristics such as appropriate staffing levels (Prendergast et al 2017), collaborations across stakeholders (Abdel-Salam et al 2015;Green et al 2015;Lamberti 2016), communities of practice among practitioners (Pearson et al 2015), and partnerships with treatment courts (Abdel-Salam et al 2015) as positively impacting adoption and sustainment of these practices.…”
Section: Mrt Implementation In Non-correctional Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interviews with VJP specialists regarding their perceptions of the implementation potential of treatments for recidivism in VHA provide some insights by highlighting cross-service (e.g., VJP and behavioral health) and cross-system (e.g., healthcare and criminal justice system) partnerships as potential facilitators to MRT implementation in this noncorrectional setting (Blonigen et al 2018a). The broader literature on implementation of evidence-based practices for justice-involved populations also point to facility characteristics such as appropriate staffing levels (Prendergast et al 2017), collaborations across stakeholders (Abdel-Salam et al 2015;Green et al 2015;Lamberti 2016), communities of practice among practitioners (Pearson et al 2015), and partnerships with treatment courts (Abdel-Salam et al 2015) as positively impacting adoption and sustainment of these practices.…”
Section: Mrt Implementation In Non-correctional Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%