2012 Sixth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/rcis.2012.6240465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building CMS-based Web applications using a model-driven approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[16], [17], and [15] deal with Figure 4: eJSL Editor within the IntelliJ IDEA platform-independent meta models for the WCMS domain, whereas [15] also generates concrete WCMS-based web applications. However, all of these works overlook their models' extensibility, which necessitates further abstraction.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16], [17], and [15] deal with Figure 4: eJSL Editor within the IntelliJ IDEA platform-independent meta models for the WCMS domain, whereas [15] also generates concrete WCMS-based web applications. However, all of these works overlook their models' extensibility, which necessitates further abstraction.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its abstract syntax is defined with the CMS Common Metamodel [14]. It is supported by an UML-like graphical editor implemented in Graphical Modeling Framework (GMF) [14].…”
Section: Cms Dslmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its abstract syntax is defined with the CMS Common Metamodel [14]. It is supported by an UML-like graphical editor implemented in Graphical Modeling Framework (GMF) [14]. For this implementation, we used EuGENia [15] which is a tool that generates automatically the models .gmfgraph, .gmftool and .gmfmap which implement the UML-like graphical editor in GMF.…”
Section: Cms Dslmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the chosen bottom-up development approach, a generalisation of the presented approach to other CMSs cannot be excluded. Approaches, like the proposal of [7], have similar intentions and propose ways to consider several CMSs within an independent meta model. The described methodology for the development of an abstract meta model for CMSs may possibly adapted to general our approach to other CMSs.…”
Section: Abstraction To Other Cmssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the approach for CMSs with their specific objects and functionality with a specialized focus on extensions and their connection to the CMS core is new. Besides the approaches of UWE (UML-based Web Engineering) [2], WebML (Web Modelling Language) [1] and WSL (Web Specific Language) [6], other approaches for modelling languages like [7], [3], [9] and the TOGAF Content Metamodel 9 , or infrastructures as described in [5] and [4] exist. To handle model and data evolution within migration processes we will examine the suitability of the approach described in [8], which deals with model evolution.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%