2023
DOI: 10.1177/21651434231183415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building Equity Into Transition Practice and Service Delivery: A Call for Systemic Changes in the Field of Transition

Abstract: There is a common narrative in the field of transition; students with disabilities continue to experience poorer post-school outcomes compared with their peers without disabilities. After decades of research and practice, scholars and practitioners have impacted countless numbers of students. However, disparate outcomes for diverse youth still exist. The Division on Career Development and Transition takes the position that if we are to begin reducing persistent differential outcomes for diverse youth, we must … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 59 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While currently the TSAT does not provide student-level data, we encourage school and VR administrators to review the TSAT data in combination with other school-wide and district-wide data to critically examine who is and is not benefitting from the current transition service delivery models. This recommendation aligns with the urgent call to embed equity into transition practice by engaging in equity-focused data-based decision-making (e.g., Sinclair et al, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…While currently the TSAT does not provide student-level data, we encourage school and VR administrators to review the TSAT data in combination with other school-wide and district-wide data to critically examine who is and is not benefitting from the current transition service delivery models. This recommendation aligns with the urgent call to embed equity into transition practice by engaging in equity-focused data-based decision-making (e.g., Sinclair et al, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%